These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16052022)

  • 1. Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth.
    White C
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):281-8. PubMed ID: 16052022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are Impact Factors corrupting truth and utility in biomedical research?
    Suhrbier A; Poland GA
    Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31(51):6041-2. PubMed ID: 24184289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [What can we learn from the Scott Reuben case? Scientific misconduct in anaesthesiology].
    Rittner HL; Kranke P; Schäfer M; Roewer N; Brack A
    Anaesthesist; 2009 Dec; 58(12):1199-209. PubMed ID: 19902152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sir John Maddox and the ethics of heresy.
    Wolpe PR
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 19998143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
    Freedman JE
    Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):288-91. PubMed ID: 16052023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
    Pontille D; Torny D
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The importance of being earnest in post-publication review: scientific fraud and the scourges of anonymity and excuses.
    Stebbing J; Sanders DA
    Oncogene; 2018 Feb; 37(6):695-696. PubMed ID: 29035386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Academic fraud: perspectives from a lifelong anesthesia researcher.
    Mutch WA
    Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):782-4, 784-8. PubMed ID: 21643872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Scientific misconduct, mistakes or something in between?].
    Levi R
    Lakartidningen; 2006 Apr 12-25; 103(15-16):1203-5. PubMed ID: 16696201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beautification and fraud.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Feb; 8(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 16450003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Fraud and misconduct in scientific publications].
    Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
    Neurologia; 2010; 25(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20388454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misinformation in the medical literature: what role do error and fraud play?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Aug; 37(8):498-503. PubMed ID: 21343631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shaking up science.
    Couzin-Frankel J
    Science; 2013 Jan; 339(6118):386-9. PubMed ID: 23349264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
    Werkö L
    Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publish or be damned.
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1997 Sep; 155(2099):53. PubMed ID: 16127834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Randomized clinical trials: variants, randomization methods, analysis, ethical issues and regulations].
    Lazcano-Ponce E; Salazar-Martínez E; Gutiérrez-Castrellón P; Angeles-Llerenas A; Hernández-Garduño A; Viramontes JL
    Salud Publica Mex; 2004; 46(6):559-84. PubMed ID: 15624861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges.
    Mullane K; Williams M
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 138():7-18. PubMed ID: 28396196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why published research is untrustworthy.
    Lose G; Klarskov N
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1271-1274. PubMed ID: 28707207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.