These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16053256)

  • 1. Testing threshold and hormesis in a random effects dose-response model applied to developmental toxicity data.
    Hunt D; Rai SN
    Biom J; 2005 Jun; 47(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 16053256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A parametric model for detecting hormetic effects in developmental toxicity studies.
    Hunt DL; Bowman D
    Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 15028001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new threshold dose-response model including random effects for data from developmental toxicity studies.
    Hunt DL; Rai SN
    J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(5):435-9. PubMed ID: 16092077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved empirical models describing hormesis.
    Cedergreen N; Ritz C; Streibig JC
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2005 Dec; 24(12):3166-72. PubMed ID: 16445100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A shared response model for clustered binary data in developmental toxicity studies.
    Pang Z; Kuk AY
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1076-84. PubMed ID: 16401281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novel approach to predicting hormetic effects of antibiotic mixtures on Vibrio fischeri.
    Zou X; Lin Z; Deng Z; Yin D
    Chemosphere; 2013 Feb; 90(7):2070-6. PubMed ID: 23200841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comments on "Implications of Hormesis for Industrial Hygiene".
    Brown SL
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2002 Jul; 21(7):397-8. PubMed ID: 15497238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical modeling of the hormetic dose zone and the toxic potency completes the quantitative description of hormetic dose responses.
    Belz RG; Piepho HP
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 May; 34(5):1169-77. PubMed ID: 25523646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for treatment related trend with partially exchangeable clustered data.
    George EO; Wu H
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):479-87. PubMed ID: 9192447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Principles of risk assessment for determining the safety of chemicals: recent assessment of residual solvents in drugs and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
    Hasegawa R; Koizumi M; Hirose A
    Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2004 Jun; 44(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 15198717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hormesis predicts low-dose responses better than threshold models.
    Calabrese EJ; Stanek EJ; Nascarella MA; Hoffmann GR
    Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27(5):369-78. PubMed ID: 19037807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A meta-analysis of evidence for hormesis in animal radiation carcinogenesis, including a discussion of potential pitfalls in statistical analyses to detect hormesis.
    Crump KS; Duport P; Jiang H; Shilnikova NS; Krewski D; Zielinski JM
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2012; 15(3):210-31. PubMed ID: 22458256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical modeling of hormesis quantities in inverted U-shaped dose-response relationships by reparameterization of a bilogistic model.
    Nweke CO; Nwangwu OR; Okechi RN; Araka NN; Ogbonna CJ
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2022; 57(12):1003-1023. PubMed ID: 36433811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling non-monotonic dose-response relationships: model evaluation and hormetic quantities exploration.
    Zhu XW; Liu SS; Qin LT; Chen F; Liu HL
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2013 Mar; 89():130-6. PubMed ID: 23266374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hormetic dose responses induced by organic flame retardants in aquatic animals: Occurrence and quantification.
    Sun T; Ji C; Li F; Wu H
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 820():153295. PubMed ID: 35065129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of mixed effects logistic regression models for binary response data with two nested levels of clustering.
    Ten Have TR; Kunselman AR; Tran L
    Stat Med; 1999 Apr; 18(8):947-60. PubMed ID: 10363333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developmental toxicity and uterotrophic studies with di-2-ethylhexyl terephthalate.
    Faber WD; Deyo JA; Stump DG; Navarro L; Ruble K; Knapp J
    Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2007 Oct; 80(5):396-405. PubMed ID: 17849488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Historical blunders: how toxicology got the dose-response relationship half right.
    Calabrese EJ
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2005 Dec; 51(7):643-54. PubMed ID: 16359616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The marginalization of hormesis.
    Calabrese EJ; Baldwin LA
    Toxicol Pathol; 1999; 27(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 10207983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A regression spline model for developmental toxicity data.
    Hunt DL; Li CS
    Toxicol Sci; 2006 Jul; 92(1):329-34. PubMed ID: 16624852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.