264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16053257)
1. Estimating heterogeneity in random effects models for longitudinal data.
Lemenuel-Diot A; Mallet A; Laveille C; Bruno R
Biom J; 2005 Jun; 47(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 16053257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mixture modeling for the detection of subpopulations in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis.
Lemenuel-Diot A; Laveille C; Frey N; Jochemsen R; Mallet A
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Apr; 34(2):157-81. PubMed ID: 17151938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard errors for EM estimates in generalized linear models with random effects.
Friedl H; Kauermann G
Biometrics; 2000 Sep; 56(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 10985213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonlinear mixed-effects models with misspecified random-effects distribution.
Drikvandi R
Pharm Stat; 2020 May; 19(3):187-201. PubMed ID: 31663263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimum Hellinger distance estimation for k-component poisson mixture with random effects.
Xiang L; Yau KK; Van Hui Y; Lee AH
Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):508-18. PubMed ID: 17970817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Joint modeling of survival time and longitudinal outcomes with flexible random effects.
Choi J; Zeng D; Olshan AF; Cai J
Lifetime Data Anal; 2018 Jan; 24(1):126-152. PubMed ID: 28856493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating population size for a continuous time frailty model with covariates in a capture-recapture study.
Xu Y; Liu L; You N; Pan H; Yip P
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):917-21. PubMed ID: 17403102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proportional likelihood ratio mixed model for discrete longitudinal data.
Wu H; Jones MP
Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2272-2285. PubMed ID: 33588517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A latent-class mixture model for incomplete longitudinal Gaussian data.
Beunckens C; Molenberghs G; Verbeke G; Mallinckrodt C
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 17608789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Expected estimating equations for missing data, measurement error, and misclassification, with application to longitudinal nonignorable missing data.
Wang CY; Huang Y; Chao EC; Jeffcoat MK
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 17608787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Continuous time Markov models for binary longitudinal data.
Jones RH; Xu S; Grunwald GK
Biom J; 2006 Jun; 48(3):411-9. PubMed ID: 16845905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification of longitudinal data through a semiparametric mixed-effects model based on lasso-type estimators.
Arribas-Gil A; De la Cruz R; Lebarbier E; Meza C
Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):333-43. PubMed ID: 25639332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The bayesian bias correction method of the first-order approximation of nonlinear mixed-effects models for population pharmacokinetics.
Funatogawa T; Funatogawa I
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(3):381-92. PubMed ID: 17479388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data.
Ju K; Lin L; Chu H; Cheng LL; Xu C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32539721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance in population models for count data, part II: a new SAEM algorithm.
Savic R; Lavielle M
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2009 Aug; 36(4):367-79. PubMed ID: 19680795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficient pairwise composite likelihood estimation for spatial-clustered data.
Bai Y; Kang J; Song PX
Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):661-70. PubMed ID: 24945876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An approximate marginal logistic distribution for the analysis of longitudinal ordinal data.
Nooraee N; Abegaz F; Ormel J; Wit E; van den Heuvel ER
Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):253-61. PubMed ID: 26458164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analyzing spatially distributed binary data using independent-block estimating equations.
Oman SD; Landsman V; Carmel Y; Kadmon R
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):892-900. PubMed ID: 17489971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variable selection for semiparametric mixed models in longitudinal studies.
Ni X; Zhang D; Zhang HH
Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 19397585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
