BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16054179)

  • 1. Reduced likelihood of cancer screening among women in urban areas and with low socio-economic status: a multilevel analysis in Japan.
    Fukuda Y; Nakamura K; Takano T
    Public Health; 2005 Oct; 119(10):875-84. PubMed ID: 16054179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast, colon, and prostate screening in the adult population of Croatia: does rural origin matter?
    Polasek O; Kolcic I; Voncina L; Strnad M; Vuletic S; Kern J
    Rural Remote Health; 2007; 7(3):749. PubMed ID: 17900222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by individual-level and area-based measures of socioeconomic status, 2000 to 2002.
    Coughlin SS; King J; Richards TB; Ekwueme DU
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Nov; 15(11):2154-9. PubMed ID: 17119040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Area disadvantage, individual socio-economic position, and premature cancer mortality in Australia 1998 to 2000: a multilevel analysis.
    Bentley R; Kavanagh AM; Subramanian SV; Turrell G
    Cancer Causes Control; 2008 Mar; 19(2):183-93. PubMed ID: 18027094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accumulation of health risk behaviours is associated with lower socioeconomic status and women's urban residence: a multilevel analysis in Japan.
    Fukuda Y; Nakamura K; Takano T
    BMC Public Health; 2005 May; 5():53. PubMed ID: 15921512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of socio-economic variables in cancer screening participation: a comparison between population-based and opportunistic screening in the EU-15.
    Walsh B; Silles M; O'Neill C
    Health Policy; 2011 Aug; 101(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 21420755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Socioeconomic pattern of smoking in Japan: income inequality and gender and age differences.
    Fukuda Y; Nakamura K; Takano T
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 May; 15(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15840550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are there associations between socio-economic status and known diabetes in an elderly Finnish population?
    Hiltunen LA
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 2005 Dec; 13(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 16419383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Income inequality and limitations in activities of daily living: a multilevel analysis of the 2003 American Community Survey.
    Fuller-Thomson E; Gadalla T
    Public Health; 2008 Mar; 122(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 17981309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association of contextual factors and breast cancer screening: finding new targets to promote early detection.
    Litaker D; Tomolo A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007; 16(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 17324095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How socio-economic status contributes to participation in leisure-time physical activity.
    Cerin E; Leslie E
    Soc Sci Med; 2008 Jun; 66(12):2596-609. PubMed ID: 18359137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Child malnutrition and maternal overweight in same households in poor urban areas of Benin].
    Deleuze Ntandou Bouzitou G; Fayomi B; Delisle H
    Sante; 2005; 15(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 16478707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening among urban Mexican women.
    Couture MC; Nguyen CT; Alvarado BE; Velasquez LD; Zunzunegui MV
    Prev Med; 2008 Nov; 47(5):471-6. PubMed ID: 18675296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
    de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Women's willingness to pay for cancer screening].
    Kwak MS; Sung NY; Yang JH; Park EC; Choi K
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2006 Jul; 39(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 16910307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heat or eat: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and nutritional and health risks among children less than 3 years of age.
    Frank DA; Neault NB; Skalicky A; Cook JT; Wilson JD; Levenson S; Meyers AF; Heeren T; Cutts DB; Casey PH; Black MM; Berkowitz C
    Pediatrics; 2006 Nov; 118(5):e1293-302. PubMed ID: 17079530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in predictors of cervical and breast cancer screening by screening need in uninsured Latino women.
    Buki LP; Jamison J; Anderson CJ; Cuadra AM
    Cancer; 2007 Oct; 110(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 17696119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the socio-economic and demographic impact on health-related quality of life: evidence from Greece.
    Pappa E; Kontodimopoulos N; Papadopoulos AA; Niakas D
    Int J Public Health; 2009; 54(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 19424661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Health indicator-based cluster analysis of districts and urban districts in North Rhine-Westphalia].
    Strohmeier KP; Schultz A; Bardehle D; Annuss R; Lenz A
    Gesundheitswesen; 2007 Jan; 69(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 17347929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geographic remoteness, area-level socio-economic disadvantage and advanced breast cancer: a cross-sectional, multilevel study.
    Baade PD; Turrell G; Aitken JF
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2011 Nov; 65(11):1037-43. PubMed ID: 21282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.