These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16054179)

  • 1. Reduced likelihood of cancer screening among women in urban areas and with low socio-economic status: a multilevel analysis in Japan.
    Fukuda Y; Nakamura K; Takano T
    Public Health; 2005 Oct; 119(10):875-84. PubMed ID: 16054179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast, colon, and prostate screening in the adult population of Croatia: does rural origin matter?
    Polasek O; Kolcic I; Voncina L; Strnad M; Vuletic S; Kern J
    Rural Remote Health; 2007; 7(3):749. PubMed ID: 17900222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by individual-level and area-based measures of socioeconomic status, 2000 to 2002.
    Coughlin SS; King J; Richards TB; Ekwueme DU
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Nov; 15(11):2154-9. PubMed ID: 17119040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Area disadvantage, individual socio-economic position, and premature cancer mortality in Australia 1998 to 2000: a multilevel analysis.
    Bentley R; Kavanagh AM; Subramanian SV; Turrell G
    Cancer Causes Control; 2008 Mar; 19(2):183-93. PubMed ID: 18027094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accumulation of health risk behaviours is associated with lower socioeconomic status and women's urban residence: a multilevel analysis in Japan.
    Fukuda Y; Nakamura K; Takano T
    BMC Public Health; 2005 May; 5():53. PubMed ID: 15921512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of socio-economic variables in cancer screening participation: a comparison between population-based and opportunistic screening in the EU-15.
    Walsh B; Silles M; O'Neill C
    Health Policy; 2011 Aug; 101(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 21420755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Socioeconomic pattern of smoking in Japan: income inequality and gender and age differences.
    Fukuda Y; Nakamura K; Takano T
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 May; 15(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15840550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are there associations between socio-economic status and known diabetes in an elderly Finnish population?
    Hiltunen LA
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 2005 Dec; 13(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 16419383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Income inequality and limitations in activities of daily living: a multilevel analysis of the 2003 American Community Survey.
    Fuller-Thomson E; Gadalla T
    Public Health; 2008 Mar; 122(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 17981309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association of contextual factors and breast cancer screening: finding new targets to promote early detection.
    Litaker D; Tomolo A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007; 16(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 17324095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How socio-economic status contributes to participation in leisure-time physical activity.
    Cerin E; Leslie E
    Soc Sci Med; 2008 Jun; 66(12):2596-609. PubMed ID: 18359137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Child malnutrition and maternal overweight in same households in poor urban areas of Benin].
    Deleuze Ntandou Bouzitou G; Fayomi B; Delisle H
    Sante; 2005; 15(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 16478707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening among urban Mexican women.
    Couture MC; Nguyen CT; Alvarado BE; Velasquez LD; Zunzunegui MV
    Prev Med; 2008 Nov; 47(5):471-6. PubMed ID: 18675296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
    de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Women's willingness to pay for cancer screening].
    Kwak MS; Sung NY; Yang JH; Park EC; Choi K
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2006 Jul; 39(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 16910307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heat or eat: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and nutritional and health risks among children less than 3 years of age.
    Frank DA; Neault NB; Skalicky A; Cook JT; Wilson JD; Levenson S; Meyers AF; Heeren T; Cutts DB; Casey PH; Black MM; Berkowitz C
    Pediatrics; 2006 Nov; 118(5):e1293-302. PubMed ID: 17079530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in predictors of cervical and breast cancer screening by screening need in uninsured Latino women.
    Buki LP; Jamison J; Anderson CJ; Cuadra AM
    Cancer; 2007 Oct; 110(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 17696119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the socio-economic and demographic impact on health-related quality of life: evidence from Greece.
    Pappa E; Kontodimopoulos N; Papadopoulos AA; Niakas D
    Int J Public Health; 2009; 54(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 19424661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Health indicator-based cluster analysis of districts and urban districts in North Rhine-Westphalia].
    Strohmeier KP; Schultz A; Bardehle D; Annuss R; Lenz A
    Gesundheitswesen; 2007 Jan; 69(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 17347929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geographic remoteness, area-level socio-economic disadvantage and advanced breast cancer: a cross-sectional, multilevel study.
    Baade PD; Turrell G; Aitken JF
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2011 Nov; 65(11):1037-43. PubMed ID: 21282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.