611 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16054190)
1. Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.
Brooks KR; Gillam BJ
Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 16054190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis.
Makino Y; Yano M
Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis.
Grove PM; Brooks KR; Anderson BL; Gillam BJ
Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1695-705; discussion 1706. PubMed ID: 16009392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flash lag in depth.
Harris LR; Duke PA; Kopinska A
Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2735-42. PubMed ID: 16469350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stereomotion perception for a monocularly camouflaged stimulus.
Brooks KR; Gillam BJ
J Vis; 2007 Oct; 7(13):1.1-14. PubMed ID: 17997629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new look at binocular stereopsis.
Pizlo Z; Li Y; Francis G
Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2244-55. PubMed ID: 15924939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Asymmetry between horizontal and vertical illusory lines in determining the depth of their embedded surface.
Yazdanbakhsh A; Watanabe T
Vision Res; 2004; 44(22):2621-7. PubMed ID: 15358077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces.
Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):11. PubMed ID: 20884560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of binocular stereopsis in monoptic depth perception.
Wilcox LM; Harris JM; McKee SP
Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2367-77. PubMed ID: 17651780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monocular depth effects on perceptual fading.
Hsu LC; Kramer P; Yeh SL
Vision Res; 2010 Aug; 50(17):1649-55. PubMed ID: 20580732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of a disparity pattern on the perception of direction: non-retinal information masks retinal information.
Ishii M
Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1563-8. PubMed ID: 19324065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disparity biasing in depth from monocular occlusions.
Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
Vision Res; 2011 Jul; 51(14):1699-711. PubMed ID: 21651926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The structure of stereoscopic masking: position, disparity, and size tuning.
Tyler CW; Kontsevich LL
Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3096-108. PubMed ID: 16168458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Amodal completion with background determines depth from monocular gap stereopsis.
Grove PM; Ben Sachtler WL; Gillam BJ
Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3771-4. PubMed ID: 16938332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apparent position in depth of stationary moving three-dimensional objects.
Tsui SY; Khuu SK; Hayes A
Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 17069871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception.
Harris JM; Wilcox LM
Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(22):2666-85. PubMed ID: 19577589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of depth and motion from ambiguous binocular information.
Sakai K; Ogiya M; Hirai Y
Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2471-80. PubMed ID: 15961137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
Lou L
Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
