These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16054280)

  • 1. Comparison of cumulative low back loads of caregivers when transferring patients using overhead and floor mechanical lifting devices.
    Santaguida PL; Pierrynowski M; Goldsmith C; Fernie G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Nov; 20(9):906-16. PubMed ID: 16054280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biomechanical and ergonomic evaluation of patient transferring tasks: bed to wheelchair and wheelchair to bed.
    Garg A; Owen B; Beller D; Banaag J
    Ergonomics; 1991 Mar; 34(3):289-312. PubMed ID: 1829037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing back stress to nursing personnel: an ergonomic intervention in a nursing home.
    Garg A; Owen B
    Ergonomics; 1992 Nov; 35(11):1353-75. PubMed ID: 1425566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transfer of the horizontal patient: the effect of a friction reducing assistive device on low back mechanics.
    McGill SM; Kavcic NS
    Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(8):915-29. PubMed ID: 16147412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biomechanical assessment of floor and overhead lifts using one or two caregivers for patient transfers.
    Dutta T; Holliday PJ; Gorski SM; Baharvandy MS; Fernie GR
    Appl Ergon; 2012 May; 43(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 21875699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repositioning a slumped person in a wheelchair. A biomechanical analysis of three transfer techniques.
    Varcin-Coad L; Barrett R
    AAOHN J; 1998 Nov; 46(11):530-6. PubMed ID: 9934001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A biomechanical analysis of methods used for transferring totally dependent patients.
    Ulin SS; Chaffin DB; Patellos CL; Blitz SG; Emerick CA; Lundy F; Misher L
    SCI Nurs; 1997 Mar; 14(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9165952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comprehensive analysis of low-back disorder risk and spinal loading during the transferring and repositioning of patients using different techniques.
    Marras WS; Davis KG; Kirking BC; Bertsche PK
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):904-26. PubMed ID: 10424181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining the minimum sampling rate needed to accurately quantify cumulative spine loading from digitized video.
    Andrews DM; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 14559419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical analysis of the effect of changing patient-handling technique.
    Schibye B; Hansen AF; Hye-Knudsen CT; Essendrop M; Böcher M; Skotte J
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Mar; 34(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 12628568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biomechanical and ergonomic evaluation of patient transferring tasks: wheelchair to shower chair and shower chair to wheelchair.
    Garg A; Owen B; Beller D; Banaag J
    Ergonomics; 1991 Apr; 34(4):407-19. PubMed ID: 1860461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of predictive methods for estimating cumulative spinal loading.
    Callaghan JP; Salewytsch AJ; Andrews DM
    Ergonomics; 2001 Jul; 44(9):825-37. PubMed ID: 11560364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of ergonomic devices on mechanical load during patient handling activities in nursing homes.
    Koppelaar E; Knibbe HJ; Miedema HS; Burdorf A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(6):708-18. PubMed ID: 22393034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An ergonomic evaluation of nursing assistants' job in a nursing home.
    Garg A; Owen BD; Carlson B
    Ergonomics; 1992 Sep; 35(9):979-95. PubMed ID: 1387079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1187-99. PubMed ID: 10503053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.
    Chany AM; Parakkat J; Yang G; Burr DL; Marras WS
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 16651224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An ergonomic comparison between mechanical and manual patient transfer techniques.
    Silvia CE; Bloswick DS; Lillquist D; Wallace D; Perkins MS
    Work; 2002; 19(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 12454348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can low back loading during lifting be reduced by placing one leg beside the object to be lifted?
    Kingma I; Faber GS; Bakker AJ; van Dieën JH
    Phys Ther; 2006 Aug; 86(8):1091-105. PubMed ID: 16879043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new method for overhead drilling.
    Rempel D; Star D; Barr A; Gibbons B; Janowitz I
    Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1584-9. PubMed ID: 19941190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.