These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16054633)

  • 1. Probabilistic analysis of the influence of the bonding degree of the stem-cement interface in the performance of cemented hip prostheses.
    Pérez MA; Grasa J; García-Aznar JM; Bea JA; Doblaré M
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(10):1859-72. PubMed ID: 16054633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Nicolella DP; Thacker BH; Katoozian H; Davy DT
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can finite element models detect clinically inferior cemented hip implants?
    Stolk J; Maher SA; Verdonschot N; Prendergast PJ; Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Apr; (409):138-50. PubMed ID: 12671496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length.
    Chang PB; Mann KA; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):57-69. PubMed ID: 9917591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stair climbing is more critical than walking in pre-clinical assessment of primary stability in cementless THA in vitro.
    Kassi JP; Heller MO; Stoeckle U; Perka C; Duda GN
    J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1143-54. PubMed ID: 15797595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer simulation on fatigue behavior of cemented hip prostheses: a physiological model.
    Hung JP; Chen JH; Chiang HL; Wu JS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Nov; 76(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15451160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
    Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probabilistic finite element analysis of the uncemented hip replacement--effect of femur characteristics and implant design geometry.
    Dopico-González C; New AM; Browne M
    J Biomech; 2010 Feb; 43(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 19896129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative finite element analysis of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; Palacios J
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 38(6):2093-106. PubMed ID: 20232148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of a proximal femur-cemented femoral THJR component construct: influence of assigned interface conditions on strain energy density.
    Lewis G; Duggineni R
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 17075167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element-based preclinical testing of cemented total hip implants.
    Stolk J; Janssen D; Huiskes R; Verdonschot N
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 456():138-47. PubMed ID: 17075379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A finite element study of the initiation of failure of fixation in cemented femoral total hip components.
    Harrigan TP; Kareh JA; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Jan; 10(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 1727933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of a genetic algorithm for multiobjective design optimization of the femoral stem of a cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Ishida T; Nishimura I; Tanino H; Higa M; Ito H; Mitamura Y
    Artif Organs; 2011 Apr; 35(4):404-10. PubMed ID: 21332564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study.
    Gupta S; van der Helm FC; van Keulen F
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2004 Mar; 19(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15003345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of geometrical uncertainty on cemented hip implant structural integrity.
    Bah MT; Browne M
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 May; 131(5):054501. PubMed ID: 19388785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.