231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16054727)
1. Age-related differences in novelty and target processing among cognitively high performing adults.
Daffner KR; Ryan KK; Williams DM; Budson AE; Rentz DM; Scinto LF; Holcomb PJ
Neurobiol Aging; 2005 Oct; 26(9):1283-95. PubMed ID: 16054727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Age-related differences in attention to novelty among cognitively high performing adults.
Daffner KR; Ryan KK; Williams DM; Budson AE; Rentz DM; Wolk DA; Holcomb PJ
Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 16198046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of age and individual differences in executive function on stimulus processing in the oddball task.
West R; Schwarb H; Johnson BN
Cortex; 2010 Apr; 46(4):550-63. PubMed ID: 19720373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Targets and non-targets in the aging brain: A go/nogo event-related potential study.
Vallesi A
Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 20974222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age-sensitivity of P3 in high-functioning adults.
Fjell AM; Walhovd KB
Neurobiol Aging; 2005 Oct; 26(9):1297-9; discussion 1301-6. PubMed ID: 16054729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual target processing in high- and low-performing older subjects indexed by P3 component.
Lorenzo-López L; Amenedo E; Pazo-Alvarez P; Cadaveira F
Neurophysiol Clin; 2007; 37(2):53-61. PubMed ID: 17540288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased responsiveness to novelty is associated with successful cognitive aging.
Daffner KR; Ryan KK; Williams DM; Budson AE; Rentz DM; Wolk DA; Holcomb PJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1759-73. PubMed ID: 17014379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. P300-amplitudes in upper limb amputees with and without phantom limb pain in a visual oddball paradigm.
Karl A; Diers M; Flor H
Pain; 2004 Jul; 110(1-2):40-8. PubMed ID: 15275750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pathophysiology underlying diminished attention to novel events in patients with early AD.
Daffner KR; Rentz DM; Scinto LF; Faust R; Budson AE; Holcomb PJ
Neurology; 2001 May; 56(10):1377-83. PubMed ID: 11376191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. P300 and neuropsychological tests as measures of aging: scalp topography and cognitive changes.
Fjell AM; Walhovd KB
Brain Topogr; 2001; 14(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 11599530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total sleep deprivation and novelty processing: implications for frontal lobe functioning.
Gosselin A; De Koninck J; Campbell KB
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):211-22. PubMed ID: 15589199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential effects of aging on processes underlying task switching.
West R; Travers S
Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 18403080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis.
Debener S; Makeig S; Delorme A; Engel AK
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 15722203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual attention study in youth with spastic cerebral palsy using the event-related potential method.
Hakkarainen E; Pirilä S; Kaartinen J; Eriksson K; van der Meere JJ
J Child Neurol; 2011 Dec; 26(12):1525-8. PubMed ID: 21670388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selective attention to spatial and non-spatial visual stimuli is affected differentially by age: effects on event-related brain potentials and performance data.
Talsma D; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):249-61. PubMed ID: 16806547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Behavioral and neural correlates of cognitive-affective function during late pregnancy: an Event-Related Potentials study.
Raz S
Behav Brain Res; 2014 Jul; 267():17-25. PubMed ID: 24671067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of aging on habituation to novelty: an ERP study.
Richardson C; Bucks RS; Hogan AM
Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 20869996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-task P3-changes following a brief, rigorous visual task indicate individual differences in the task-specific ability.
Sircar S; Gautam S; Tandon OP
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2004 Jul; 48(3):311-20. PubMed ID: 15648403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3.
Goldstein A; Spencer KM; Donchin E
Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 12462506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
