These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16054994)

  • 1. Early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss: why, what, where, and how.
    Mansberger SL; Demirel S
    Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2005 Sep; 18(3):365-73, v-vi. PubMed ID: 16054994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Costa VP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Nov; 138(5):897-8; author reply 898-9. PubMed ID: 15531345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glaucomatous visual field defects: their characteristics and how to detect them.
    Kitazawa Y; Yamamoto T
    Clin Neurosci; 1997; 4(5):279-83. PubMed ID: 9292256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Sarić D; Mandić Z; Iveković R; Geber MZ; Benić G; Tomić Z; Grgić D
    Coll Antropol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():111-3. PubMed ID: 16193690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What are the options of psychophysical approaches in glaucoma?
    Monhart M
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 52 Suppl 2():S127-33. PubMed ID: 17998037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The psychophysics of glaucoma: improving the structure/function relationship.
    Anderson RS
    Prog Retin Eye Res; 2006 Jan; 25(1):79-97. PubMed ID: 16081311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry.
    Horn FK; Brenning A; Jünemann AG; Lausen B
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 17570999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpreting glaucoma progression by white-on-white perimetry.
    Tan JC; Franks WA; Hitchings RA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jul; 240(7):585-92. PubMed ID: 12136293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of an automated confrontation testing device versus finger counting in the detection of field loss.
    Bass SJ; Cooper J; Feldman J; Horn D
    Optometry; 2007 Aug; 78(8):390-5. PubMed ID: 17662927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerized kinetic perimetry detects tubular visual fields in patients with functional visual loss.
    Pineles SL; Volpe NJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):933-5. PubMed ID: 15126161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Staging functional damage in glaucoma: review of different classification methods.
    Brusini P; Johnson CA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2007; 52(2):156-79. PubMed ID: 17355855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.