These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16055190)

  • 1. Uncertainty in biokinetic parameters on bioremediation: health risks and economic implications.
    Wethasinghe C; Yuen ST; Kaluarachchi JJ; Hughes R
    Environ Int; 2006 Apr; 32(3):312-23. PubMed ID: 16055190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertain numbers and uncertainty in the selection of input distributions--consequences for a probabilistic risk assessment of contaminated land.
    Sander P; Bergbäck B; Oberg T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Oct; 26(5):1363-75. PubMed ID: 17054537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty characterization approaches for risk assessment of DBPs in drinking water: a review.
    Chowdhury S; Champagne P; McLellan PJ
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Apr; 90(5):1680-91. PubMed ID: 19167150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the adequacy of maximum contaminant levels as health-protective cleanup goals: an analysis based on Monte Carlo techniques.
    Finley BL; Scott P; Paustenbach DJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Dec; 18(3):438-55. PubMed ID: 8128005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combining the cost of reducing uncertainty with the selection of risk assessment models for remediation decision of site contamination.
    Chen YC; Ma HW
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Mar; 141(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 16926066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A spatial risk assessment methodology to support the remediation of contaminated land.
    Carlon C; Pizzol L; Critto A; Marcomini A
    Environ Int; 2008 Apr; 34(3):397-411. PubMed ID: 18031816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncertainty evaluation of human risk analysis (HRA) of chemicals by multiple exposure routes.
    Sassi G; Ruggeri B
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1343-56. PubMed ID: 18684163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a screening approach to interpret human biomonitoring data on volatile organic compounds: reverse dosimetry on biomonitoring data for trichloroethylene.
    Liao KH; Tan YM; Clewell HJ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Oct; 27(5):1223-36. PubMed ID: 18076492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating biologically based models into assessments of risk from chemical contaminants.
    Bull RJ; Conolly RB; De Marini DM; MacPhail RC; Ohanian EV; Swenberg JA
    J Am Water Works Assoc; 1993 Mar; 85(3):49-52. PubMed ID: 11538064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the value of reducing uncertainty by sampling in a groundwater remediation system.
    Ma HW; Chang CC
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Aug; 402(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 18539311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance assessment model development and parameter acquisition for analysis of the transport of natural radionuclides in a Mediterranean watershed.
    Agüero A
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Sep; 348(1-3):32-50. PubMed ID: 16162312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainty estimation of pathlines in ground water models.
    Stauffer F
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(6):843-9. PubMed ID: 16324006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model comparison for risk assessment: a case study of contaminated groundwater.
    Chen YC; Ma HW
    Chemosphere; 2006 May; 63(5):751-61. PubMed ID: 16213568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty and precaution in European environmental risk assessment of chemicals.
    Verdonck FA; Van Sprang PA; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):227-34. PubMed ID: 16315366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncertainty assessment of contaminant plume length estimates in heterogeneous aquifers.
    Beyer C; Bauer S; Kolditz O
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Sep; 87(1-2):73-95. PubMed ID: 16781794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards quantitative uncertainty assessment for cancer risks: central estimates and probability distributions of risk in dose-response modeling.
    Kopylev L; Chen C; White P
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec; 49(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 17905499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Separation of uncertainty and interindividual variability in human exposure modeling.
    Ragas AM; Brouwer FP; Büchner FL; Hendriks HW; Huijbregts MA
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 19(2):201-12. PubMed ID: 18398446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Joint propagation of variability and imprecision in assessing the risk of groundwater contamination.
    Baudrit C; Guyonnet D; Dubois D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):72-84. PubMed ID: 17321003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of water quality management with a systematic qualitative uncertainty analysis.
    Chen CF; Ma HW; Reckhow KH
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Mar; 374(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 17258295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulations in health risk assessment.
    Biesiada M
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2001; 14(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 11885924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.