240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16055757)
1. Biomechanical determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.
Vorp DA; Vande Geest JP
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol; 2005 Aug; 25(8):1558-66. PubMed ID: 16055757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The role of computational mechanics].
Giannoglou G; Giannakoulas G; Hatzitolios AI; Rudolf J
Herz; 2008 Jul; 33(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 18773155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model.
Rissland P; Alemu Y; Einav S; Ricotta J; Bluestein D
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):031001. PubMed ID: 19154060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient-specific biomechanical profiling in abdominal aortic aneurysm development and rupture.
Malkawi AH; Hinchliffe RJ; Xu Y; Holt PJ; Loftus IM; Thompson MM
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Aug; 52(2):480-8. PubMed ID: 20395107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue.
Di Martino ES; Bohra A; Vande Geest JP; Gupta N; Makaroun MS; Vorp DA
J Vasc Surg; 2006 Mar; 43(3):570-6; discussion 576. PubMed ID: 16520175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment: demonstrative application.
Vande Geest JP; Di Martino ES; Bohra A; Makaroun MS; Vorp DA
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Nov; 1085():11-21. PubMed ID: 17182918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of biomechanical failure criteria for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Volokh KY
J Biomech; 2010 Jul; 43(10):2032-4. PubMed ID: 20381050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo feasibility case study for evaluating abdominal aortic aneurysm tissue properties and rupture potential using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging.
Tierney AP; Callanan A; McGloughlin TM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Apr; 4(3):507-13. PubMed ID: 21316639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical indices are more sensitive than diameter in predicting rupture of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Polzer S; Gasser TC; Vlachovský R; Kubíček L; Lambert L; Man V; Novák K; Slažanský M; Burša J; Staffa R
J Vasc Surg; 2020 Feb; 71(2):617-626.e6. PubMed ID: 31176634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Raghavan ML; Kratzberg J; Castro de Tolosa EM; Hanaoka MM; Walker P; da Silva ES
J Biomech; 2006; 39(16):3010-6. PubMed ID: 16337949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Porohyperelastic finite element modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Ayyalasomayajula A; Vande Geest JP; Simon BR
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Oct; 132(10):104502. PubMed ID: 20887020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Introduction to biomechanics related to endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Raghavan ML; Kratzberg JA; Golzarian J
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Mar; 8(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 16098937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advancements in identifying biomechanical determinants for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.
Kontopodis N; Metaxa E; Papaharilaou Y; Tavlas E; Tsetis D; Ioannou C
Vascular; 2015 Feb; 23(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 24757027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors promoting rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Van Damme H; Sakalihasan N; Limet R
Acta Chir Belg; 2005 Feb; 105(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15790196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Papaharilaou Y; Ekaterinaris JA; Manousaki E; Katsamouris AN
J Biomech; 2007; 40(2):367-77. PubMed ID: 16500664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis and computer program for rupture-risk prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Kleinstreuer C; Li Z
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Mar; 5():19. PubMed ID: 16529648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computational evaluation of aortic aneurysm rupture risk: what have we learned so far?
Georgakarakos E; Ioannou CV; Papaharilaou Y; Kostas T; Katsamouris AN
J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Apr; 18(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 21521062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of blood flow and vessel geometry on wall stress and rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Li Z; Kleinstreuer C
J Med Eng Technol; 2006; 30(5):283-97. PubMed ID: 16980283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Review: the role of biomechanical modeling in the rupture risk assessment for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Martufi G; Christian Gasser T
J Biomech Eng; 2013 Feb; 135(2):021010. PubMed ID: 23445055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Speelman L; Bohra A; Bosboom EM; Schurink GW; van de Vosse FN; Makaorun MS; Vorp DA
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 17227104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
