These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16056131)

  • 1. Brain potentials to sexually suggestive whistles show meaning modulates the mismatch negativity.
    Frangos J; Ritter W; Friedman D
    Neuroreport; 2005 Aug; 16(12):1313-7. PubMed ID: 16056131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suprasegmental speech cues are automatically processed by the human brain: a mismatch negativity study.
    Honbolygó F; Csépe V; Ragó A
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Jun; 363(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 15158003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phoneme quality and quantity are processed independently in the human brain.
    Ylinen S; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
    Neuroreport; 2005 Nov; 16(16):1857-60. PubMed ID: 16237342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study.
    Sabri M; Liebenthal E; Waldron EJ; Medler DA; Binder JR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):689-700. PubMed ID: 16768370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Event-related brain potentials to change in the frequency and temporal structure of sounds in typically developing 5-6-year-old children.
    Ervast L; Hämäläinen JA; Zachau S; Lohvansuu K; Heinänen K; Veijola M; Heikkinen E; Suominen K; Luotonen M; Lehtihalmes M; Leppänen PH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Dec; 98(3 Pt 1):413-25. PubMed ID: 26342552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech-feature discrimination in children with Asperger syndrome as determined with the multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm.
    Kujala T; Kuuluvainen S; Saalasti S; Jansson-Verkasalo E; Wendt LV; Lepistö T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 121(9):1410-1419. PubMed ID: 20382070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brain responses reveal hardwired detection of native-language rule violations.
    Aaltonen O; Hellström A; Peltola MS; Savela J; Tamminen H; Lehtola H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Oct; 444(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 18706481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory mismatch negativity for speech sound contrasts is modulated by language context.
    Lipski SC; Mathiak K
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jul; 19(10):1079-83. PubMed ID: 18580583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of deviant probability on the 'optimal' multi-feature mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm.
    Fisher DJ; Grant B; Smith DM; Knott VJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):311-5. PubMed ID: 21111009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impaired cortical network for preattentive detection of change in speech sounds in schizophrenia: a high-resolution event-related potential study.
    Kasai K; Nakagome K; Itoh K; Koshida I; Hata A; Iwanami A; Fukuda M; Kato N
    Am J Psychiatry; 2002 Apr; 159(4):546-53. PubMed ID: 11925291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mismatch negativity: clinical and other applications.
    Näätänen R; Escera C
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(3-4):105-10. PubMed ID: 10859407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of frequency deviance direction on performance and mismatch negativity.
    Karanasiou IS; Papageorgiou C; Kyprianou M; Tsianaka EI; Matsopoulos GK; Ventouras EM; Uzunoglu NK
    J Integr Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 10(4):525-36. PubMed ID: 22262539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal regularity effects on pre-attentive and attentive processing of deviance.
    Schwartze M; Rothermich K; Schmidt-Kassow M; Kotz SA
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Apr; 87(1):146-51. PubMed ID: 21382437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transitional Probabilities Are Prioritized over Stimulus/Pattern Probabilities in Auditory Deviance Detection: Memory Basis for Predictive Sound Processing.
    Mittag M; Takegata R; Winkler I
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(37):9572-9. PubMed ID: 27629709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preattentive phonotactic processing as indexed by the mismatch negativity.
    Steinberg J; Truckenbrodt H; Jacobsen T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2174-85. PubMed ID: 19947859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mismatch negativity to pitch contours is influenced by language experience.
    Chandrasekaran B; Krishnan A; Gandour JT
    Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1128(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 17125749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced mismatch negativity brain response after binaural word presentation.
    Endrass T; Mohr B; Pulvermüller F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 19(6):1653-60. PubMed ID: 15066161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance.
    Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Winkler I; Horváth J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1704-13. PubMed ID: 16269107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Change and novelty detection in speech and non-speech sound streams.
    Sorokin A; Alku P; Kujala T
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1327():77-90. PubMed ID: 20188710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.