These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16058538)

  • 1. Slides: away with the fuzz.
    Nature; 1970 Oct; 228(5270):416. PubMed ID: 16058538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peach fuzz contains large amounts of lipid transfer protein: is this the cause of the high prevalence of sensitization to LTP in Mediterranean countries?
    Asero R; Mistrello G; Amato S; Roncarolo D; Martinelli A; Zaccarini M
    Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2006 Apr; 38(4):118-21. PubMed ID: 16805416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fuzziness of "fuzz".
    McManus JF
    Science; 1967 Aug; 157(3788):490-1. PubMed ID: 17801396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of cytological stains on comparative genomic hybridization analysis for DNA extracted from cytological smears.
    Kawauchi S; Sugimoto S; Liu XP; Ikemoto K; Furuya T; Takahashi M; Sasaki K
    Oncol Rep; 2007 Nov; 18(5):1219-23. PubMed ID: 17914576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should pathologists send all or only selected slides for patient-requested interlaboratory second opinion?
    Renshaw MA; Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Nov; 132(5):763-6. PubMed ID: 19846819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of cytologic intrarater and interrater reproducibility: the case of ductal lavage.
    Visvanathan K; Santor D; Ali SZ; Hong IS; Davidson NE; Helzlsouer KJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Dec; 15(12):2553-6. PubMed ID: 17164385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical cytology reading times: a comparison between ThinPrep Imager and conventional methods.
    Davey E; Irwig L; Macaskill P; Chan SF; D'Assuncao J; Richards A; Farnsworth A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Sep; 35(9):550-4. PubMed ID: 17703458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quality of fiber counts using improved slides with relocatable fields.
    Pang TW; Harper M
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Jan; 10(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 18175021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introduction and evaluation of virtual microscopy in teaching veterinary cytopathology.
    Neel JA; Grindem CB; Bristol DG
    J Vet Med Educ; 2007; 34(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 18287470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Synthesis of surfactant-templated silica films with orthogonally aligned hexagonal mesophase.
    Koganti VR; Rankin SE
    J Phys Chem B; 2005 Mar; 109(8):3279-83. PubMed ID: 16851353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. User attitudes in analyzing digital slides in a quality control test bed: a preliminary study.
    Della Mea V; Demichelis F; Viel F; Dalla Palma P; Beltrami CA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 May; 82(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 16632072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of screening times between the ThinPrep Imager and conventional cytology.
    Boost T
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Sep; 37(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 19459203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 'Word fuzz'-to the barricades!
    Griffiths F
    Can Fam Physician; 1982 May; 28():844. PubMed ID: 21286094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification and testing of control peptides for antigen microarrays.
    Ngo Y; Advani R; Valentini D; Gaseitsiwe S; Mahdavifar S; Maeurer M; Reilly M
    J Immunol Methods; 2009 Apr; 343(2):68-78. PubMed ID: 19162032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of 2 whole-slide imaging applications in dermatopathology.
    Velez N; Jukic D; Ho J
    Hum Pathol; 2008 Sep; 39(9):1341-9. PubMed ID: 18614200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized comparison of virtual microscopy and traditional glass microscopy in diagnostic accuracy among dermatology and pathology residents.
    Koch LH; Lampros JN; Delong LK; Chen SC; Woosley JT; Hood AF
    Hum Pathol; 2009 May; 40(5):662-7. PubMed ID: 19144382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens with no residual carcinoma in the initial review of slides.
    Duffield AS; Epstein JI
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 18971774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dutch solutions for liquid-based cytology: analysis of unsatisfactory slides and HPV testing of equivocal cytology.
    Boon ME; Rijkaart DC; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Korporaal H
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Sep; 34(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 16900471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between take-away methadone policies and methadone diversion.
    Ritter A; Di Natale R
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2005 Jul; 24(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 16234130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characteristics of dermatologists who read dermatopathology slides.
    Brauer JA; Shin DB; Troxel AB; Shapiro M; Levy RM; Ming ME
    J Cutan Pathol; 2007 Sep; 34(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 17696915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.