These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16059426)

  • 1. "What does this mean?" How Web-based consumer health information fails to support information seeking in the pursuit of informed consent for screening test decisions.
    Burkell J; Campbell DG
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2005 Jul; 93(3):363-73. PubMed ID: 16059426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs.
    Zapka JG; Geller BM; Bulliard JL; Fracheboud J; Sancho-Garnier H; Ballard-Barbash R;
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):126-37. PubMed ID: 16962910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening.
    Wolf AM; Nasser JF; Wolf AM; Schorling JB
    Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jun; 156(12):1333-6. PubMed ID: 8651843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using health web sites for patient education.
    Oermann MH
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2003 Jul; 30(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 12851597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Web content accessibility of consumer health information web sites for people with disabilities: a cross sectional evaluation.
    Zeng X; Parmanto B
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Jun; 6(2):e19. PubMed ID: 15249268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The low availability of metadata elements for evaluating the quality of medical information on the World Wide Web.
    Shon J; Musen MA
    Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():945-9. PubMed ID: 10566500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the quality of epilepsy education on the Canadian World Wide Web.
    Burneo JG
    Epilepsy Behav; 2006 Feb; 8(1):299-302. PubMed ID: 16275110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deciding on PSA-screening - Quality of current consumer information on the Internet.
    Korfage IJ; van den Bergh RC; Essink-Bot ML
    Eur J Cancer; 2010 Nov; 46(17):3073-81. PubMed ID: 21047589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What information do breast cancer screening programmes provide to Italian women?
    Giordano L; Rowinski M; Gaudenzi G; Segnan N
    Eur J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 15(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 15788806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communicating with women about mammography.
    Geller BM; Zapka J; Hofvind SS; Scharpantgen A; Giordano L; Ohuchi N; Ballard-Barbash R
    J Cancer Educ; 2007; 22(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 17570805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based information on mammography screening in Austria--reality or more pie in the sky?
    Rásky É; Groth S
    Gesundheitswesen; 2013 Mar; 75(3):e18-22. PubMed ID: 23361407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quality of childhood brain tumour information on the Internet in French language].
    Hargrave D; Bartels U; Lau L; Esquembre C; Bouffet E
    Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):650-5. PubMed ID: 12957807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surfing the Internet for information on breast augmentation.
    Sagrillo D; Kunz S
    Plast Surg Nurs; 2004; 24(4):158-64. PubMed ID: 15632725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Notions of reliability: considering the importance of difference in guiding patients to health care Web sites.
    Adams SA; De Bont AA
    Methods Inf Med; 2003; 42(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 14534627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening.
    van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; ten Kate LP; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):110-7. PubMed ID: 16242899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS study).
    Hoffman RM; Couper MP; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Levin CA; McNaughton-Collins M; Helitzer DL; VanHoewyk J; Barry MJ
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Sep; 169(17):1611-8. PubMed ID: 19786681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
    Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of quality and trustworthiness of Internet resources by personal health information seekers.
    Stavri PZ; Freeman DJ; Burroughs CM
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():629-33. PubMed ID: 14728249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A quality evaluation methodology of health web-pages for non-professionals.
    Currò V; Buonuomo PS; Onesimo R; de Rose P; Vituzzi A; di Tanna GL; D'Atri A
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2004 Jun; 29(2):95-107. PubMed ID: 15370990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are women getting relevant information about mammography screening for an informed consent: a critical appraisal of information brochures used for screening invitation in Germany, Italy, Spain and France.
    Gummersbach E; Piccoliori G; Zerbe CO; Altiner A; Othman C; Rose C; Abholz HH
    Eur J Public Health; 2010 Aug; 20(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 19892852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.