These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16060230)

  • 1. Dynamical vs. judgmental comparison: hysteresis effects in motion perception.
    Hock HS; Bukowski L; Nichols DF; Huisman A; Rivera M
    Spat Vis; 2005; 18(3):317-35. PubMed ID: 16060230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bistability and hysteresis in the organization of apparent motion patterns.
    Hock HS; Kelso JA; Schöner G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Feb; 19(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 8440989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiplicative effects of intention on the perception of bistable apparent motion.
    Suzuki S; Peterson MA
    Psychol Sci; 2000 May; 11(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 11273404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of element orientation on apparent motion perception.
    Werkhoven P; Snippe HP; Koenderink JJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jun; 47(6):509-25. PubMed ID: 2367172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion?
    Green M
    Vision Res; 1986; 26(4):599-607. PubMed ID: 3739235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coherence and transparency of moving plaids composed of Fourier and non-Fourier gratings.
    Victor JD; Conte MM
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Oct; 52(4):403-14. PubMed ID: 1437473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial and orientation specific integration in the tilt illusion.
    Johnstone S; Wenderoth P
    Perception; 1989; 18(1):5-23. PubMed ID: 2771594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is a crucial determinant in anorthoscopic perception?
    Sohmiya T; Sohmiya K
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Jun; 78(3 Pt 1):987-98. PubMed ID: 8084724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial phase differences can drive apparent motion.
    Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Feb; 58(2):174-90. PubMed ID: 8838163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Timed reactions to an object in apparent motion: evidence on Cartesian and non-Cartesian perceptual hypotheses.
    Cowan N; Greenspahn E
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 May; 57(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 7596751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time-till-breakdown and scalp electrical potential maps of long-range apparent motion.
    Selmes CM; Fulham WR; Finlay DC; Chorlton MC; Manning ML
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 May; 59(4):489-99. PubMed ID: 9158324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion.
    Chatterjee SH; Freyd JJ; Shiffrar M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Aug; 22(4):916-29. PubMed ID: 8756959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-range apparent motion as a result of perceptual organisation.
    Oyama T; Naito K; Naito H
    Perception; 1994; 23(3):269-86. PubMed ID: 7971106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual grouping in space and time: evidence from the Ternus display.
    Kramer P; Yantis S
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 9038411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bistable illusory rebound motion: Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging of perceptual states and switches.
    Hsieh PJ; Caplovitz GP; Tse PU
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):728-39. PubMed ID: 16702003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interaction between orientation and motion signals in moving oriented Glass patterns.
    Pavan A; Bimson LM; Gall MG; Ghin F; Mather G
    Vis Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 34():E010. PubMed ID: 28965515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The emergence of dynamic form through phase relations in dynamical systems.
    Malloy TE; Butner J; Jensen GC
    Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2008 Oct; 12(4):371-95. PubMed ID: 18765072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wheels: a new illusion in the perception of rolling objects.
    Vicario GB; Bressan P
    Perception; 1990; 19(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 2336336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dynamics of the visual system in combining conflicting KDE and binocular stereopsis cues.
    Uomori K; Nishida S
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 May; 55(5):526-36. PubMed ID: 8008554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural basis of stable perception of an ambiguous apparent motion stimulus.
    Kaneoke Y; Urakawa T; Hirai M; Kakigi R; Murakami I
    Neuroscience; 2009 Mar; 159(1):150-60. PubMed ID: 19138729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.