These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16060232)

  • 1. Stopping rules in Bayesian adaptive threshold estimation.
    Alcalá-Quintana R; García-Pérez MA
    Spat Vis; 2005; 18(3):347-74. PubMed ID: 16060232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold.
    Kontsevich LL; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 1999 Aug; 39(16):2729-37. PubMed ID: 10492833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of fixed-step-size and Bayesian staircases for sensory threshold estimation.
    Alcalá-Quintana R; García-Pérez MA
    Spat Vis; 2007; 20(3):197-218. PubMed ID: 17524255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of a dynamic termination criterion in the ZEST adaptive threshold method.
    Anderson AJ
    Vision Res; 2003 Jan; 43(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 12536138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation.
    King-Smith PE; Grigsby SS; Vingrys AJ; Benes SC; Supowit A
    Vision Res; 1994 Apr; 34(7):885-912. PubMed ID: 8160402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical performance of optimal Bayesian adaptive estimation.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2009 May; 12(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 19476214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: What slope should be assumed for the psychometric function?
    Serrano-Pedraza I; Vancleef K; Herbert W; Goodship N; Woodhouse M; Read JCA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226822. PubMed ID: 31895925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical validation of QUEST+ in PSE and JND estimations in visual discrimination tasks.
    Paire A; Hillairet de Boisferon A; Paeye C
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):3984-4001. PubMed ID: 36538168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient assessment of the time course of perceptual sensitivity change.
    Zhao Y; Lesmes L; Lu ZL
    Vision Res; 2019 Jan; 154():21-43. PubMed ID: 30389389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian adaptive estimation of arbitrary points on a psychometric function.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):147-74. PubMed ID: 17535585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying steep psychometric function slope quickly in clinical applications.
    Turpin A; Jankovic D; McKendrick A
    Vision Res; 2010 Nov; 50(23):2476-85. PubMed ID: 20801144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advantages of terminating Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (ZEST) with dynamic criteria for white-on-white perimetry.
    McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):981-7. PubMed ID: 16317375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The psi-marginal adaptive method: How to give nuisance parameters the attention they deserve (no more, no less).
    Prins N
    J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(7):3. PubMed ID: 23750016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying over-estimation in early stopped clinical trials and the "freezing effect" on subsequent research.
    Wang H; Rosner GL; Goodman SN
    Clin Trials; 2016 Dec; 13(6):621-631. PubMed ID: 27271682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Principles of an adaptive method for measuring the slope of the psychometric function.
    King-Smith PE; Rose D
    Vision Res; 1997 Jun; 37(12):1595-604. PubMed ID: 9231226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive staircase techniques in psychoacoustics: a comparison of human data and a mathematical model.
    Kollmeier B; Gilkey RH; Sieben UK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 May; 83(5):1852-62. PubMed ID: 3403801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tracking of nociceptive thresholds using adaptive psychophysical methods.
    Doll RJ; Buitenweg JR; Meijer HG; Veltink PH
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 23835651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vision thresholds from psychometric analyses: alternatives to probit analysis.
    Simpson TL
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 72(6):371-7. PubMed ID: 7566899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes: asymptotic and small-sample properties.
    García-Pérez MA
    Vision Res; 1998 Jun; 38(12):1861-81. PubMed ID: 9797963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.