These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16060446)

  • 1. Comparisons of continuous and discrete methods for combining probability values associated with matched-pairs t-test data.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ; Johnston JE
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Jun; 100(3 Pt 1):799-805. PubMed ID: 16060446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining probability values from independent permutation tests: a discrete analog of Fisher's classical method.
    Mielke PW; Johnston JE; Berry KJ
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Oct; 95(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 15587207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Putative null distributions corresponding to tests of differential expression in the Golden Spike dataset are intensity dependent.
    Gaile DP; Miecznikowski JC
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():105. PubMed ID: 17445265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case.
    Fay MP; Proschan MA; Brittain E
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 25274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical methods for analysing discrete and categorical data recorded in performance analysis.
    Nevill AM; Atkinson G; Hughes MD; Cooper SM
    J Sports Sci; 2002 Oct; 20(10):829-44. PubMed ID: 12363298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher's approach.
    Whitlock MC
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1368-73. PubMed ID: 16135132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Permutation tests: precision in estimating probability values.
    Johnston JE; Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):915-20. PubMed ID: 18229545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cartography of epidemiologic data. The principal methods of making continuous data discrete and their importance in cartographic representation].
    Rican S
    Sante; 1998; 8(6):461-70. PubMed ID: 10064921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical scales of order in DNA.
    Poland D
    Biophys Chem; 2009 May; 141(2-3):203-13. PubMed ID: 19254822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical Method for Integrative Platform Analysis: Application to Integration of Proteomic and Microarray Data.
    Gao X
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1362():199-207. PubMed ID: 26519179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parameter-free testing of the shape of a probability distribution.
    Broom M; Nouvellet P; Bacon JP; Waxman D
    Biosystems; 2007; 90(2):509-15. PubMed ID: 17293028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidence intervals that match Fisher's exact or Blaker's exact tests.
    Fay MP
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):373-4. PubMed ID: 19948745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive designs based on the truncated product method.
    Neuhäuser M; Bretz F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Sep; 5():30. PubMed ID: 16171518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Lancaster's mid-P correction to the Fisher's exact test for adverse impact analyses.
    Biddle DA; Morris SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):956-65. PubMed ID: 21688881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size estimation in single-arm clinical trials with multiple testing under frequentist and Bayesian approaches.
    Zaslavsky BG; Scott J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):819-35. PubMed ID: 22651117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power for detecting genetic divergence: differences between statistical methods and marker loci.
    Ryman N; Palm S; André C; Carvalho GR; Dahlgren TG; Jorde PE; Laikre L; Larsson LC; Palmé A; Ruzzante DE
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2031-45. PubMed ID: 16780422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comments on 'choosing an optimal method to combine P-values': by S. Won, N. Morris, Q. Liu, R. C. Elston, Statistics in Medicine 2009; 28:1537-1553.
    Koziol JA
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3043-5. PubMed ID: 19810092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A program for computing the prediction probability and the related receiver operating characteristic graph.
    Jordan D; Steiner M; Kochs EF; Schneider G
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Dec; 111(6):1416-21. PubMed ID: 21059744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Yates's correction for continuity and the analysis of 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Haviland MG
    Stat Med; 1990 Apr; 9(4):363-7; discussion 369-83. PubMed ID: 2362976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.