191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16060767)
1. The dynamics of experimentally induced criterion shifts.
Brown S; Steyvers M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):587-99. PubMed ID: 16060767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the dynamic nature of response criterion in recognition memory: effects of base rate, awareness, and feedback.
Rhodes MG; Jacoby LL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 17352613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Allocation of attention and task difficulty.
Merrill EC; Peacock M
Am J Ment Retard; 1994 Mar; 98(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 8192904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
Acha J; Perea M
Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Change detection evokes a Simon-like effect.
Galfano G; Mazza V; Tamè L; Umiltà C; Turatto M
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):186-96. PubMed ID: 17573027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reaction time: An alternative method for assessing the effects of multiple sclerosis on information processing speed.
Reicker LI; Tombaugh TN; Walker L; Freedman MS
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Jun; 22(5):655-64. PubMed ID: 17532182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Context-sensitive adjustments of cognitive control: conflict-adaptation effects are modulated by processing demands of the ongoing task.
Fischer R; Dreisbach G; Goschke T
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):712-8. PubMed ID: 18444768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of two diffusion process models in accounting for payoff and stimulus frequency manipulations.
Leite FP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1366-82. PubMed ID: 22669791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the roles of change discrimination and luminance integration: evidence for a hybrid race model of perceptual decision making in luminance discrimination.
Rouder JN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Feb; 26(1):359-78. PubMed ID: 10696623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voluntary task switching: chasing the elusive homunculus.
Arrington CM; Logan GD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):683-702. PubMed ID: 16060773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing idiom comprehension in aphasic patients: the effects of task and idiom type.
Papagno C; Caporali A
Brain Lang; 2007 Feb; 100(2):208-20. PubMed ID: 16487581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory.
Morrell HE; Gaitan S; Wixted JT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1095-110. PubMed ID: 12450335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
Topolinski S; Strack F
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks.
Mulligan NW; Peterson D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):662-79. PubMed ID: 18444763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relatively fast! Efficiency advantages of comparative thinking.
Mussweiler T; Epstude K
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 19203167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implicit task sets in task switching?
Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The psychophysics of contingency assessment.
Allan LG; Hannah SD; Crump MJ; Siegel S
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):226-43. PubMed ID: 18473655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling the effects of choice-set size on the processing of letters and words.
Rouder JN
Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 14756587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adjusting behavioral methods when applying nonlinear dynamical measures to stimulus rate.
Frey BB
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2006 Apr; 10(2):241-73. PubMed ID: 16519867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
