These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16061281)

  • 1. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of the shape of the layers in photo-cured dental restorations on the shrinkage stress peaks-FEM study.
    Kowalczyk P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):e83-91. PubMed ID: 19786300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A two-stage shape optimization process for cavity preparation.
    Shi L; Fok AS; Qualtrough A
    Dent Mater; 2008 Nov; 24(11):1444-53. PubMed ID: 18533246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strengthening of a model composite restoration using shape optimization: a numerical and experimental study.
    Li H; Yun X; Li J; Shi L; Fok AS; Madden MJ; Labuz JF
    Dent Mater; 2010 Feb; 26(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 19818487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining structural-thermal coupled field FE analysis and the Taguchi method to evaluate the relative contributions of multi-factors in a premolar adhesive MOD restoration.
    Lin CL; Chang YH; Lin YF
    J Dent; 2008 Aug; 36(8):626-36. PubMed ID: 18550252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis.
    Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Apicella D; Valentino B; Ferrari M; Aversa R; Apicella A
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1035-44. PubMed ID: 16406084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading.
    Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 17767951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical fatigue 3D-FE modeling of indirect composite-restored posterior teeth.
    Ausiello P; Franciosa P; Martorelli M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2011 May; 27(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 21227484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis.
    Yamanel K; Caglar A; Gülsahi K; Ozden UA
    Dent Mater J; 2009 Nov; 28(6):661-70. PubMed ID: 20019416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars.
    Magne P; Knezevic A
    Dent Mater; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1264-8. PubMed ID: 19539358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transient thermal and stress analysis of maxillary second premolar tooth using an exact three-dimensional model.
    Hashemipour MA; Mohammadpour A; Nassab SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20657080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of failure risks in ceramic restorations for endodontically treated premolar with MOD preparation.
    Lin CL; Chang YH; Pai CA
    Dent Mater; 2011 May; 27(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 21227485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resin restorations.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):875-80. PubMed ID: 20830883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Load-induced stresses in photoelastic primary canines with facial restorations.
    Rabitz GK; Berson R; Caputo AA; Franklin RJ; Del Fierro DB
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 17367035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.