264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16061317)
1. Biomechanical simulations of scoliotic spine correction due to prone position and anaesthesia prior to surgical instrumentation.
Duke K; Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Labelle H
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Nov; 20(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 16061317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of soft tissue properties on spinal flexibility in scoliosis: biomechanical simulation of fulcrum bending.
Little JP; Adam CJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E76-82. PubMed ID: 19139657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic positioning of scoliotic patients during spine instrumentation surgery.
Duke K; Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Koller A; Labelle H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):190-6. PubMed ID: 19412021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite element simulation of various strategies for CD correction.
Lafage V; Dubousset J; Lavaste F; Skalli W
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():428-32. PubMed ID: 15457770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element modeling of vertebral body stapling applied for the correction of idiopathic scoliosis: preliminary results.
Lalonde NM; Aubin CE; Pannetier R; Villemure I
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 140():111-5. PubMed ID: 18810010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Boston brace correction in idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical study.
Périé D; Aubin CE; Petit Y; Beauséjour M; Dansereau J; Labelle H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1672-7. PubMed ID: 12897490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of prone surgical positioning on the scoliotic spine.
Driscoll CR; Aubin CÉ; Canet F; Labelle H; Dansereau J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 May; 25(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 21423056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relation between patient positioning, trunk flexibility and surgical correction of the scoliotic spine.
Petit Y; Aubin CE; Labelle H
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():400-3. PubMed ID: 15456070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Biomechanical modeling of instrumentation for the scoliotic spine using flexible elements: a feasibility study].
Poulin F; Aubin CE; Stokes IA; Gardner-Morse M; Labelle H
Ann Chir; 1998; 52(8):761-7. PubMed ID: 9846426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study of patient positioning on a dynamic frame for scoliosis surgery.
Duke K; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Koller A; Joncas J; Aubin CE
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():144-8. PubMed ID: 15457712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical modeling of the lateral decubitus posture during corrective scoliosis surgery.
Lalonde NM; Villemure I; Pannetier R; Parent S; Aubin CE
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jul; 25(6):510-6. PubMed ID: 20413197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical simulation of Colorado instrumentation of the scoliotic spine: a preliminary study.
Verniest F; Petit Y; Chopin D; Godillon-Maquinghen AP; Cheriet F; Drazetic P; Aubin CE
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():415-8. PubMed ID: 15456074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Spinal instrumentation, source of progress, but also revealing pitfalls].
Dubousset J
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2003; 187(3):523-33. PubMed ID: 14556467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Personalized biomechanical simulations of orthotic treatment in idiopathic scoliosis.
Périé D; Aubin CE; Petit Y; Labelle H; Dansereau J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Feb; 19(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 14967583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The assessment of immediate post-operative scoliosis correction using pedicle screw system by utilising the fulcrum bending technique.
Chan CY; Kwan MK; Saravanan S; Saw LB; Deepak AS
Med J Malaysia; 2007 Mar; 62(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 17682567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical analysis of spino-pelvic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after spinal instrumentation and fusion: a case study.
Pasha S; Aubin CE; Labelle H; Parent S; Mac-Thiong JM
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 176():125-8. PubMed ID: 22744474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical modeling of posterior instrumentation of the scoliotic spine.
Aubin CE; Petit Y; Stokes IA; Poulin F; Gardner-Morse M; Labelle H
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Feb; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 12623435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of alternative instrumentation strategies in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical analysis.
Robitaille M; Aubin CE; Labelle H
J Orthop Res; 2009 Jan; 27(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 18634064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vitro biomechanical investigation: variable positioning of leopard carbon fiber interbody cages.
Quigley KJ; Alander DH; Bledsoe JG
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 18679101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of correction objectives on the optimal scoliosis instrumentation strategy: a preliminary study.
Majdouline Y; Aubin CE; Labelle H
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 140():116-20. PubMed ID: 18810011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
