1047 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16061336)
1. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory efferent feedback system deficits precede age-related hearing loss: contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in mice.
Zhu X; Vasilyeva ON; Kim S; Jacobson M; Romney J; Waterman MS; Tuttle D; Frisina RD
J Comp Neurol; 2007 Aug; 503(5):593-604. PubMed ID: 17559088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex differences in distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a function of age in CBA mice.
Guimaraes P; Zhu X; Cannon T; Kim S; Frisina RD
Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):83-9. PubMed ID: 15157966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of age on contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human listeners with normal hearing.
Kim S; Frisina DR; Frisina RD
Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(6):348-57. PubMed ID: 12401966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of three hours of discotheque music on pure-tone thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Müller J; Dietrich S; Janssen T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1853-69. PubMed ID: 20968358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neurotoxicity of BFM-95 on the medial olivocochlear bundle assessed by means of contralateral suppression of 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Riga M; Korres S; Psarommatis I; Varvutsi M; Giotakis I; Papadas T; Ferekidis E; Apostolopoulos N
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Feb; 28(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 17255889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions declines with age: a comparison of findings in CBA mice with human listeners.
Jacobson M; Kim S; Romney J; Zhu X; Frisina RD
Laryngoscope; 2003 Oct; 113(10):1707-13. PubMed ID: 14520094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic influences on susceptibility of the auditory system to aging and environmental factors.
Li HS
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1992; 36():1-39. PubMed ID: 1488615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of occupational noise on pure-tone threshold and distortion product otoacoustic emissions after one workday.
Müller J; Janssen T
Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 246(1-2):9-22. PubMed ID: 18848612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DPOAE in estimation of the function of the cochlea in tinnitus patients with normal hearing.
Sztuka A; Pospiech L; Gawron W; Dudek K
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Feb; 37(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 19560298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outer hair cell activity of the cochlea in patients with iron deficiency anemia.
Cetin T; Yetiser S; Cekin E; Durmus C; Nevruz O; Oktenli C
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2004 Dec; 31(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 15571912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]