BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1047 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16061336)

  • 1. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory efferent feedback system deficits precede age-related hearing loss: contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in mice.
    Zhu X; Vasilyeva ON; Kim S; Jacobson M; Romney J; Waterman MS; Tuttle D; Frisina RD
    J Comp Neurol; 2007 Aug; 503(5):593-604. PubMed ID: 17559088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex differences in distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a function of age in CBA mice.
    Guimaraes P; Zhu X; Cannon T; Kim S; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):83-9. PubMed ID: 15157966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of age on contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human listeners with normal hearing.
    Kim S; Frisina DR; Frisina RD
    Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(6):348-57. PubMed ID: 12401966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
    Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of three hours of discotheque music on pure-tone thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Müller J; Dietrich S; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1853-69. PubMed ID: 20968358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neurotoxicity of BFM-95 on the medial olivocochlear bundle assessed by means of contralateral suppression of 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Riga M; Korres S; Psarommatis I; Varvutsi M; Giotakis I; Papadas T; Ferekidis E; Apostolopoulos N
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Feb; 28(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 17255889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions declines with age: a comparison of findings in CBA mice with human listeners.
    Jacobson M; Kim S; Romney J; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Oct; 113(10):1707-13. PubMed ID: 14520094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic influences on susceptibility of the auditory system to aging and environmental factors.
    Li HS
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1992; 36():1-39. PubMed ID: 1488615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
    Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of occupational noise on pure-tone threshold and distortion product otoacoustic emissions after one workday.
    Müller J; Janssen T
    Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 246(1-2):9-22. PubMed ID: 18848612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DPOAE in estimation of the function of the cochlea in tinnitus patients with normal hearing.
    Sztuka A; Pospiech L; Gawron W; Dudek K
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Feb; 37(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 19560298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outer hair cell activity of the cochlea in patients with iron deficiency anemia.
    Cetin T; Yetiser S; Cekin E; Durmus C; Nevruz O; Oktenli C
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2004 Dec; 31(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 15571912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.