These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1606205)

  • 1. Antitrust issues for the nurse anesthetist: areas of concern.
    Recht PR; Garg RK
    Nurse Anesth; 1992 Jun; 3(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 1606205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antitrust issues for the nurse anesthetist: some essentials.
    Recht PR; Garg RK
    Nurse Anesth; 1992 Mar; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 1540668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply?
    Meghrigian AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: a view from the Federal Trade Commission.
    Horoschak MJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):17-24. PubMed ID: 10116790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process.
    Hammack JM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():419-50. PubMed ID: 10126945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current topics in medical staff development and credentialing.
    Grady KE
    J Health Hosp Law; 1993 Jul; 26(7):193-213, 215. PubMed ID: 10171940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Court cases testing scope of federal law's peer review immunity.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(34):80. PubMed ID: 10119842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims?
    Cross LL
    Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antitrust issues for medical groups.
    Gamma F
    Coll Rev; 1992; 9(1):48-82. PubMed ID: 10118929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review: current law and policy problems.
    Hyman DA
    Healthspan; 1991; 8(7):3-10. PubMed ID: 10114029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Austin decision good news for peer reviewers.
    Hudson T
    Hospitals; 1993 Jan; 67(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 8419281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What issues should be considered when negotiating an employment contract? Employment contracts for CRNAs: protecting yourself amid the new economic realities.
    Le Bel LA
    Nurse Anesth; 1992 Mar; 3(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 1540670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antitrust law and the medical staff.
    Holthaus D
    Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):23. PubMed ID: 10288093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical staff peer review and federal antitrust scrutiny.
    LaCava FW
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1985 Aug; 70(8):40-1. PubMed ID: 10272117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Federal laws govern the conduct of peer review.
    Devlin MM
    Am J Med Qual; 1992; 7(3):88-90. PubMed ID: 1493383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality improvement act gets first antitrust test.
    Barnes CE
    Physician Exec; 1990; 16(4):36-8. PubMed ID: 10113358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nurse-anesthetist loses suit against hospital.
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 1990 Dec; 31(12):416-7. PubMed ID: 2287024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is physician refusal to deal with CRNAs (certified registered nurse anesthetists) an antitrust violation?
    Margolis RE
    Healthspan; 1990 Oct; 7(9):32. PubMed ID: 10107401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Avoiding antitrust liability for denial of access to resources: some safe harbors.
    Ettinger DA; Soltis KJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(4):17-21. PubMed ID: 10114113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Federal antitrust jurisdiction in peer review cases: the Pinhas decision.
    Busey RC
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1991 Nov; 9(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 10183560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.