These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1606680)

  • 1. An evaluation of four multifocal contact lenses in young monocular aphakic patients.
    Conklin JD; Litteral G; Schmeisser ET; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1992 Apr; 18(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 1606680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of three bifocal contact lenses.
    Van Meter WS; Gussler JR; Litteral G
    CLAO J; 1990; 16(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 2379307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of the Tangent Streak trifocal contact lens.
    Gussler JR; Litteral G; VanMeter WS
    CLAO J; 1991 Jul; 17(3):160-3. PubMed ID: 1893537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical assessment of Holo-Or trifocal diffractive contact lens.
    Fulga V; Schroder S; Avraham G; Belkin M
    CLAO J; 1996 Oct; 22(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 8906381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the ZEBRA 2000 (Z-10) Breger Vision bifocal contact lens.
    Smith VM; Koffler BH; Litteral G
    CLAO J; 2000 Oct; 26(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 11071346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective and subjective assessment of a new diffractive trifocal contact lens.
    Fulga V; Schroder S; Belkin M
    Metab Pediatr Syst Ophthalmol (1985); 1996-1997; 19-20():41-4. PubMed ID: 11548785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical performance of an innovative back surface multifocal contact lens in correcting presbyopia.
    Woods C; Ruston D; Hough T; Efron N
    CLAO J; 1999 Jul; 25(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 10444055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is binocular contrast sensitivity at distance compromised with multifocal soft contact lenses used to correct presbyopia?
    Soni PS; Patel R; Carlson RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):505-14. PubMed ID: 12858086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical evaluation of two multifocal soft contact lenses.
    Gussler CH; Solomon KD; Gussler JR; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1992 Oct; 18(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 1424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of the anterior constant focus (ACF) annular bifocal contact lens.
    Gussler JR; Lim ES; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1993 Oct; 19(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 8261605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peripheral visual acuity with monovision and other contact lens corrections for presbyopia.
    Collins MJ; Brown B; Verney SJ; Makras M; Bowman KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Jun; 66(6):370-4. PubMed ID: 2771322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective randomized clinical evaluation of 3 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.
    Pepose JS; Qazi MA; Chu R; Stahl J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 158(3):436-46.e1. PubMed ID: 24932989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Bifocal contact lenses as a correction method in presbyopia].
    Avetisov SE; Rybakova EG; Egorova GB; Churkina MN; Borodina NV; Boev VI
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2003; 119(4):28-31. PubMed ID: 12934502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25230076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A quantitative and qualitative assessment of the NOVAWET-Perception bifocal contact lens.
    Anderson CW; Bierly JR; Litteral G; Gross J; Hainsworth D
    CLAO J; 1996 Apr; 22(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 8728616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.