These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1607545)

  • 1. Transthoracic defibrillation: effect of sternotomy on chest impedance.
    Kerber RE; Vance S; Schomer SJ; Mariano DJ; Charbonnier F
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jul; 20(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 1607545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pediatric defibrillation: current flow is improved by using "adult" electrode paddles.
    Atkins DL; Kerber RE
    Pediatrics; 1994 Jul; 94(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 8008545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transthoracic defibrillation: does electrode adhesive pad position alter transthoracic impedance?
    Garcia LA; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 1998 Jun; 37(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 9715772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transthoracic defibrillation: importance of avoiding electrode placement directly on the female breast.
    Pagan-Carlo LA; Spencer KT; Robertson CE; Dengler A; Birkett C; Kerber RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Feb; 27(2):449-52. PubMed ID: 8557919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advance prediction of transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-energy shocks.
    Kerber RE; Kouba C; Martins J; Kelly K; Low R; Hoyt R; Ferguson D; Bailey L; Bennett P; Charbonnier F
    Circulation; 1984 Aug; 70(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 6733884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pediatric defibrillation: importance of paddle size in determining transthoracic impedance.
    Atkins DL; Sirna S; Kieso R; Charbonnier F; Kerber RE
    Pediatrics; 1988 Dec; 82(6):914-8. PubMed ID: 3186384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transthoracic electrical impedance during external defibrillation: comparison of measured and modelled waveforms.
    Al Hatib F; Trendafilova E; Daskalov I
    Physiol Meas; 2000 Feb; 21(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 10720010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transthoracic impedance study with large self-adhesive electrodes in two conventional positions for defibrillation.
    Krasteva V; Matveev M; Mudrov N; Prokopova R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Oct; 27(10):1009-22. PubMed ID: 16951460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance.
    Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a new defibrillation pathway: tongue-epigastric/tongue-apex route. II. Impedance characteristics in human subjects.
    Kerber RE; Klein S; Kouba C; Aronson A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Aug; 4(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 6736465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of electrode position and gel-application technique on predicted transcardiac current during transthoracic defibrillation.
    Caterine MR; Yoerger DM; Spencer KT; Miller SG; Kerber RE
    Ann Emerg Med; 1997 May; 29(5):588-95. PubMed ID: 9140241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of ventilation phase on transthoracic impedance and defibrillation effectiveness.
    Ewy GA; Hellman DA; McClung S; Taren D
    Crit Care Med; 1980 Mar; 8(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 7363632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrode pad size, transthoracic impedance and success of external ventricular defibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Cunningham SR; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Am J Cardiol; 1989 Oct; 64(12):741-4. PubMed ID: 2801525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Adgey AA
    Br Heart J; 1991 Jun; 65(6):311-6. PubMed ID: 2054239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated impedance-based energy adjustment for defibrillation: experimental studies.
    Kerber RE; McPherson D; Charbonnier F; Kieso R; Hite P
    Circulation; 1985 Jan; 71(1):136-40. PubMed ID: 3964715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. External defibrillation: new technologies.
    Kerber RE
    Ann Emerg Med; 1984 Sep; 13(9 Pt 2):794-7. PubMed ID: 6476544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transthoracic resistance in human defibrillation. Influence of body weight, chest size, serial shocks, paddle size and paddle contact pressure.
    Kerber RE; Grayzel J; Hoyt R; Marcus M; Kennedy J
    Circulation; 1981 Mar; 63(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 7460251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between canine transthoracic impedance and defibrillation threshold. Evidence for current-based defibrillation.
    Lerman BB; Halperin HR; Tsitlik JE; Brin K; Clark CW; Deale OC
    J Clin Invest; 1987 Sep; 80(3):797-803. PubMed ID: 3624489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initial experience with a microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator.
    Dalzell GW; Cunningham SR; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Br Heart J; 1989 Jun; 61(6):502-5. PubMed ID: 2757862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overlapping sequential pulses. A new waveform for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Kerber RE; Spencer KT; Kallok MJ; Birkett C; Smith R; Yoerger D; Kieso RA
    Circulation; 1994 May; 89(5):2369-79. PubMed ID: 8181163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.