142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16075758)
1. Influence of mimic cardiac rate on hydrodynamics of different mechanical prosthetic cardiac valves in vitro.
Chu YP; Cheng JL; Chen RK; Fan YB; Pu F
Chin Med Sci J; 2005 Jun; 20(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 16075758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydrodynamic function of tilting disc prostheses and bileaflet valves in double valve replacement.
Strüber M; Campbell A; Richard G; Laas J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1996; 10(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 8817137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro pulsatile flow hemodynamics of five mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses.
Walker PG; Yoganathan AP
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S113-23. PubMed ID: 1389270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In-vitro testing of three totally supra-annular bileaflet mechanical valves: hydrodynamics in the Sheffield pulse duplicator.
Bottio T; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Mar; 17(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 18512495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves.
Bottio T; Caprili L; Casarotto D; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Sep; 128(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 15354108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The hemodynamic performance of standard bileaflet valves is impaired by a tilted implantation position.
Hartrumpf M; Albes JM; Krempl T; Rudolph V; Wahlers T
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2003 Mar; 23(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 12614795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the CarboMedics valve.
Butterfield M; Fisher J; Davies GA; Spyt TJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 1991 Oct; 52(4):815-20. PubMed ID: 1929635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro comparison of different mechanical prostheses suitable for replacement of the systemic atrioventricular valve in children.
Bottio T; Dal Lin C; Lika A; Rizzoli G; Tarzia V; Buratto E; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 143(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 21890150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro hydrodynamic characteristics among three bileaflet valves in the mitral position.
Feng Z; Umezu M; Fujimoto T; Tsukahara T; Nurishi M; Kawaguchi D
Artif Organs; 2000 May; 24(5):346-54. PubMed ID: 10848675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro pulsatile flow study on effective orifice area of prosthetic mechanical heart valves.
Guo GX; Romero CM; Kingsbury C; Quijano RC
Biomed Sci Instrum; 1993; 29():457-64. PubMed ID: 8329627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in-vitro technique for assessment of thrombogenicity in mechanical prosthetic cardiac valves: evaluation with a range of valve types.
Martin AJ; Christy JR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):509-20. PubMed ID: 15222300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Different tilting disc valves show similar rotation-dependent impairment in hemodynamic performance under a tilted implantation position.
Hartrumpf M; Kuehnel RU; Puchner R; Wendt MO; Pohl M; Albes JM
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 53(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 16208612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Opening-closing pattern of four pericardial prostheses: results from an in vitro study of leaflet kinematics.
Tasca G; Fiore GB; Mangini A; Romagnoni C; Gamba A; Redaelli A; Antona C; Vismara R
J Artif Organs; 2016 Dec; 19(4):350-356. PubMed ID: 27230086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound signals associated with prosthetic heart valves: an in vitro study.
Mackay TG; Georgiadis D; Grosset DG; Kelman AW; Lees KR; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jul; 4(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 7582153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position].
Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C
Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Doppler assessment of mechanical aortic valve prostheses: effect of valve design and size of the aorta.
Mascherbauer J; Schima H; Maurer G; Baumgartner H
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 15473486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemodynamics of high-performance bileaflet valves: comparison to simulated clinical Doppler measurements.
Dohmen G; Schmitz C; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Autschbach R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 16901053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
