647 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16075769)
1. "P4P"--a force to be reckoned with.
Kahn C
Hosp Outlook; 2005; 8(2):12. PubMed ID: 16075769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hospitals must overcome physician resistance before P4P can take root.
Health Care Strateg Manage; 2006 Jul; 24(7):1, 14-6. PubMed ID: 16903396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bonus programs for hospitals, MDs are gaining momentum.
OR Manager; 2005 Jun; 21(6):1, 9-10. PubMed ID: 16022234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pay for performance--for whom the bell tolls.
Pickoff RM
Physician Exec; 2005; 31(6):12-4. PubMed ID: 16382645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pay for performance and the hospital quality initiative.
Elliott B
Del Med J; 2005 Aug; 77(8):289-96. PubMed ID: 16184783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Right on the money. CMS awarding pay-for-performance bonuses.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2005 Nov; 35(46):8-9. PubMed ID: 16334812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicare's pay-for-performance on the horizon.
Jain M
Tenn Med; 2005 Dec; 98(12):580-1. PubMed ID: 16401051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. P4P--the next generation. Providers need to be involved in designing new incentive payment programs.
Norling R
Mod Healthc; 2006 Nov; 36(46):20. PubMed ID: 17153788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pay-for-performance incentives: are you missing out on revenue?
Hosp Peer Rev; 2005 Oct; 30(10):133-6. PubMed ID: 16218299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Response is mixed on CMS value-based purchasing paper.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Jul; 14(7):73-6. PubMed ID: 17784719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pay for performance: will your hospital be ready?
O'Hare PK
Healthc Financ Manage; 2005 May; 59(5):46-8. PubMed ID: 15938348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medicare P4P demonstration project shows significant QI. Participants improve in all five clinical areas over three-year period.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2005 Jul; 12(7):73-6. PubMed ID: 16021975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study casts new doubt on effectiveness of P4P.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Aug; 14(8):88-9. PubMed ID: 17715880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Data from landmark P4P project are in: learn what top-rated organizations did.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2006 Feb; 31(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 16479863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The implications of reimbursement changes for specialty hospitals.
Zimmerman E
Healthc Financ Manage; 2006 Jul; 60(7):42-5. PubMed ID: 16869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. P4P lessons learned.
Dominik D
Health Data Manag; 2008 Dec; 16(12):56. PubMed ID: 19140552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Paying more for results. CMS tries to enlist Premier to tie hospital reimbursement to quality performance.
Duff S
Mod Healthc; 2002 Sep; 32(37):9. PubMed ID: 12375411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Providers: more pay in P4P. CMS says higher incentive opportunities possible.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2008 Sep; 38(37):8-9. PubMed ID: 18810821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pay for performance: is this the cure for Medicare's ills?
Siegel S
Health Care Law Mon; 2005 May; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 15954727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Weak prospects. Federal Medicaid P4P proposal has skeptics.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Feb; 37(8):10. PubMed ID: 17348345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
