These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16075834)

  • 1. Surprise and change: variations in the strength of present and absent cues in causal learning.
    Wasserman EA; Castro L
    Learn Behav; 2005 May; 33(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 16075834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human causal judgement: the role of within-compound associations.
    Wasserman EA; Berglan LR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1998 May; 51(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 9621838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Associative history affects the associative change undergone by both presented and absent cues in human causal learning.
    LePelley ME; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jan; 30(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 14709116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protecting the Rescorla-Wagner (1972) theory: A reply to Spicer et al. (2020).
    Chan YY; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2021 Apr; 47(2):211-215. PubMed ID: 34264725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrospective revaluation: The phenomenon and its theoretical implications.
    Miller RR; Witnauer JE
    Behav Processes; 2016 Feb; 123():15-25. PubMed ID: 26342855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The redundancy effect is related to a lack of conditioned inhibition: Evidence from a task in which excitation and inhibition are symmetrical.
    Zaksaite T; Jones PM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Feb; 73(2):260-278. PubMed ID: 31498020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A combination of common and individual error terms is not needed to explain associative changes when cues with different training histories are conditioned in compound: A review of Rescorla's compound test procedure.
    Holmes NM; Chan YY; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):242-256. PubMed ID: 30945928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Rescorla-Wagner model: losses in associative strength in compound conditioned stimuli.
    Kremer EF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1978 Jan; 4(1):22-36. PubMed ID: 621465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theory protection in associative learning: Humans maintain certain beliefs in a manner that violates prediction error.
    Spicer SG; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Jones PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 31556642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention.
    Kruschke JK; Blair NJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Dec; 7(4):636-45. PubMed ID: 11206204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the type of judgement required modulate cue competition?
    Cobos PL; Caño A; López FJ; Luque JL; Almaraz J
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Aug; 53(3):193-207. PubMed ID: 11006718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of within-compound associations in learning about absent cues.
    Witnauer JE; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2011 May; 39(2):146-62. PubMed ID: 21264569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An instance theory of associative learning.
    Jamieson RK; Crump MJ; Hannah SD
    Learn Behav; 2012 Mar; 40(1):61-82. PubMed ID: 21913057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The sometimes competing retrieval and Van Hamme & Wasserman models predict the selective role of within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation.
    Witnauer J; Rhodes LJ; Kysor S; Narasiwodeyar S
    Behav Processes; 2018 Sep; 154():27-35. PubMed ID: 29162375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.
    Booth SL; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positive and negative mediation as a function of whether the absent cue was previously associated with the outcome.
    Castro L; Matute H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2359-75. PubMed ID: 20603776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rescorla-Wagner Models with Sparse Dynamic Attention.
    Nishimura J; Cochran AL
    Bull Math Biol; 2020 Jun; 82(6):69. PubMed ID: 32500204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrafast Cortical Gain Adaptation in the Human Brain by Trial-To-Trial Changes of Associative Strength in Fear Learning.
    Yuan M; Giménez-Fernández T; Méndez-Bértolo C; Moratti S
    J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 38(38):8262-8276. PubMed ID: 30104342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aging and associative binding in contingency learning.
    Mutter SA; Arnold JP
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2021 Sep; 28(5):701-716. PubMed ID: 32873125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.