These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16076560)

  • 1. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions.
    Peng L; Bai J; Zeng X; Zhou Y
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16076560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions.
    Baca V; Horak Z
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Oct; 29(8):935. PubMed ID: 17097326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Some factors that affect the comparison between isotropic and orthotropic inhomogeneous finite element material models of femur.
    Yang H; Ma X; Guo T
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jul; 32(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 20435503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy from stress tensors.
    Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jan; 14(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 24777672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses.
    Baca V; Horak Z; Mikulenka P; Dzupa V
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Sep; 30(7):924-30. PubMed ID: 18243761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting the yield of the proximal femur using high-order finite-element analysis with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties.
    Yosibash Z; Tal D; Trabelsi N
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2010 Jun; 368(1920):2707-23. PubMed ID: 20439270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur.
    Wirtz DC; Pandorf T; Portheine F; Radermacher K; Schiffers N; Prescher A; Weichert D; Niethard FU
    J Biomech; 2003 Feb; 36(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 12547369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthotropic bone remodelling around uncemented femoral implant: a comparison with isotropic formulation.
    Mathai B; Dhara S; Gupta S
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Jun; 20(3):1115-1134. PubMed ID: 33768358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite-element modeling of bones from CT data: sensitivity to geometry and material uncertainties.
    Taddei F; Martelli S; Reggiani B; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2194-200. PubMed ID: 17073324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constructing anisotropic finite element model of bone from computed tomography (CT).
    Kazembakhshi S; Luo Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2619-26. PubMed ID: 25226965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis.
    Taylor WR; Roland E; Ploeg H; Hertig D; Klabunde R; Warner MD; Hobatho MC; Rakotomanana L; Clift SE
    J Biomech; 2002 Jun; 35(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 12020996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation.
    Bourne BC; van der Meulen MC
    J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 15046990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy using a database approach.
    Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; Cataldi M; Taddei F; van Rietbergen B
    J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(14):2356-62. PubMed ID: 23972430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments.
    Yosibash Z; Padan R; Joskowicz L; Milgrom C
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Jun; 129(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 17536896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis by Taylor WR et al. [J Biomech. (2002) Vol. 35, pp. 767-773].
    Wang SJ
    J Biomech; 2004 Mar; 37(3):421. PubMed ID: 14757464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probabilistic finite element analysis of a craniofacial finite element model.
    Berthaume MA; Dechow PC; Iriarte-Diaz J; Ross CF; Strait DS; Wang Q; Grosse IR
    J Theor Biol; 2012 May; 300():242-53. PubMed ID: 22306513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new approach to determine the accuracy of morphology-elasticity relationships in continuum FE analyses of human proximal femur.
    Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
    J Biomech; 2012 Nov; 45(16):2884-92. PubMed ID: 23017379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consideration of multiple load cases is critical in modelling orthotropic bone adaptation in the femur.
    Geraldes DM; Modenese L; Phillips AT
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Oct; 15(5):1029-42. PubMed ID: 26578078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.