BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16076751)

  • 1. Differential response of two cell lines sequentially irradiated with low X-ray doses.
    Güerci AM; Dulout FN; Grillo CA; Seoane AI
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2005 May; 81(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 16076751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cytogenetic analysis in Chinese hamster cells chronically exposed to low doses of X-rays.
    Güerci A; Dulout F; Seoane A
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2003 Oct; 79(10):793-9. PubMed ID: 14630538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA damage in Chinese hamster cells repeatedly exposed to low doses of X-rays.
    Güerci AM; Dulout FN; Seoane AI
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2004; 104(1-4):173-7. PubMed ID: 15162033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human and rodent cell lines showing no differences in the induction but differing in the repair kinetics of radiation-induced DNA base damage.
    Purschke M; Kasten-Pisula U; Brammer I; Dikomey E
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2004 Jan; 80(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 14761848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The repair of sublethal damage in diploid human fibroblasts: a comparison between human and rodent cell lines.
    Freeman ML; Sierra E; Hall EJ
    Radiat Res; 1983 Aug; 95(2):382-91. PubMed ID: 6611855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An ionizing radiation-sensitive mutant of CHO cells: irs-20. I. Isolation and initial characterization.
    Stackhouse MA; Bedford JS
    Radiat Res; 1993 Nov; 136(2):241-9. PubMed ID: 7504309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of chromatin structure on initial DNA damage and radiosensitivity in CHO-K1 and xrs1 cells at low doses of irradiation 1-10 Gy.
    Roos WP; Binder A; Böhm L
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2002 Sep; 41(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 12373329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pathophysiological responses of MRC-5 cells exposed to various doses of x-ray radiation.
    Jones P; Benghuzzi H; Tucci M; Richards L; Harrison G; Patel R
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2006; 42():72-7. PubMed ID: 16817588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low doses of alpha particles do not induce sister chromatid exchanges in bystander Chinese hamster cells defective in homologous recombination.
    Nagasawa H; Wilson PF; Chen DJ; Thompson LH; Bedford JS; Little JB
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2008 Mar; 7(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 18182331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An ionizing radiation-sensitive mutant of CHO cells: irs-20. II. Dose-rate effects and cellular recovery processes.
    Stackhouse MA; Bedford JS
    Radiat Res; 1993 Nov; 136(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 8248482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. L5178Y sublines: a look back from 40 years. Part 2: response to ionizing radiation.
    Szumiel I
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2005 May; 81(5):353-65. PubMed ID: 16076750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mutagenicity of low-filtered 30 kVp X-rays, mammography X-rays and conventional X-rays in cultured mammalian cells.
    Frankenberg-Schwager M; Garg I; Fran-Kenberg D; Greve B; Severin E; Uthe D; Göhde W
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Sep; 78(9):781-9. PubMed ID: 12428919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NTP Technical Report on the comparative toxicity studies of allyl acetate (CAS No. 591-87-7), allyl alcohol (CAS No. 107-18-6) and acrolein (CAS No. 107-02-8) administered by gavage to F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice.
    Irwin RD
    Toxic Rep Ser; 2006 Jul; (48):1-73, A1-H10. PubMed ID: 17160105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cytotoxicity of cigarette smoke condensate is not due to DNA double strand breaks: Comparative studies using radiosensitive mutant and wild-type CHO cells.
    Kato T; Nagasawa H; Warner C; Okayasu R; Bedford JS
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2007 Sep; 83(9):583-91. PubMed ID: 17654100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induction of apoptosis by ionizing radiation in Chinese hamster V79 cells and a radioresistant cell strain derived from V79.
    Ghosh R; Sengupta S; Bhattacharyya NP
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1996 Sep; 34(9):863-7. PubMed ID: 9014521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response of mammalian cell lines that undergo necrosis after ionizing irradiation to DNA-incorporated tritium and iodine-125 decays: implications for models of radiation action.
    Radford IR
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Dec; 78(12):1069-80. PubMed ID: 12556335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of ionizing radiation on the kinetics of DNA replication in synchronized Chinese hamster ovary cells.
    Gerner EW; Meyn RE; Humphrey RM
    Radiat Res; 1974 Oct; 60(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 10881700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential cell death in immortalized and non-immortalized cells at confluency.
    Brezden CB; Rauth AM
    Oncogene; 1996 Jan; 12(1):201-6. PubMed ID: 8552393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mutational extinction induced by sequential X irradiation and actinomycin D treatments in Chinese hamster ovary cells.
    Tokita N; MacInnes MA; Wilder ME; Chen DJ; Carpenter SG; Raju MR
    Radiat Res; 1986 Aug; 107(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 3749457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative investigations of sodium arsenite, arsenic trioxide and cadmium sulphate in combination with gamma-radiation on apoptosis, micronuclei induction and DNA damage in a human lymphoblastoid cell line.
    Hornhardt S; Gomolka M; Walsh L; Jung T
    Mutat Res; 2006 Aug; 600(1-2):165-76. PubMed ID: 16764896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.