BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16077227)

  • 21. Effects of holes on EEG forward solutions using a realistic geometry head model.
    Li J; Wang K; Zhu S; He B
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Sep; 4(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 17873421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2113-22. PubMed ID: 15605858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistical performance analysis of signal variance-based dipole models for MEG/EEG source localization and detection.
    Rodríguez-Rivera A; Van Veen BD; Wakai RT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 12665027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reduced conductivity dependence method for increase of dipole localization accuracy in the EEG inverse problem.
    Yitembe BR; Crevecoeur G; Van Keer R; Dupre L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 May; 58(5):1430-40. PubMed ID: 21257364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of skull anisotropy for the forward and inverse problem in EEG: simulation studies using FEM on realistic head models.
    Marin G; Guerin C; Baillet S; Garnero L; Meunier G
    Hum Brain Mapp; 1998; 6(4):250-69. PubMed ID: 9704264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Localization of a dipolar source in a skull phantom: realistic versus spherical model.
    Menninghaus E; Lütkenhöner B; Gonzalez SL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Oct; 41(10):986-9. PubMed ID: 7959806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of tissue anisotropy on the EEG inverse problem.
    Cook MJ; Koles ZJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4563-6. PubMed ID: 19163731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of anisotropic conductivity in the skull and white matter on transcranial direct current stimulation via an anatomically realistic finite element head model.
    Suh HS; Lee WH; Kim TS
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6961-80. PubMed ID: 23044667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of EEG dipole source localisation in presence of brain lesions.
    Vatta F; Bruno P; Inchingolo P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2000; 36():403-8. PubMed ID: 10834266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dipole location errors in electroencephalogram source analysis due to volume conductor model errors.
    Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé M; Lemahieu I; Boon P
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 Sep; 38(5):528-34. PubMed ID: 11094809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
    Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A finite-element reciprocity solution for EEG forward modeling with realistic individual head models.
    Ziegler E; Chellappa SL; Gaggioni G; Ly JQM; Vandewalle G; André E; Geuzaine C; Phillips C
    Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():542-551. PubMed ID: 25204867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1442-51. PubMed ID: 15134713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A systematic study of head tissue inhomogeneity and anisotropy on EEG forward problem computing.
    Bashar MR; Li Y; Wen P
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2010 Mar; 33(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 20333564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Subspace electrode selection methodology for the reduction of the effect of uncertain conductivity values in the EEG dipole localization: a simulation study using a patient-specific head model.
    Crevecoeur G; Restrepo VM; Staelens S
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1963-86. PubMed ID: 22421525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Nara T; Oohama J; Hashimoto M; Takeda T; Ando S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3859-79. PubMed ID: 17664582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.