These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16077263)

  • 1. Accuracy of the pressure scale of sphygmomanometers in clinical use within primary care.
    Coleman AJ; Steel SD; Ashworth M; Vowler SL; Shennan A
    Blood Press Monit; 2005 Aug; 10(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 16077263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hidden errors of aneroid sphygmomanometers.
    Waugh JJ; Gupta M; Rushbrook J; Halligan A; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):309-12. PubMed ID: 12488650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Type and accuracy of sphygmomanometers in primary care: a cross-sectional observational study.
    A'Court C; Stevens R; Sanders S; Ward A; McManus R; Heneghan C
    Br J Gen Pract; 2011 Sep; 61(590):e598-603. PubMed ID: 22152749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of sphygmomanometers at pharmacies.
    Erdem DG; Erdem E; Dilek M; Aydogdu T; Selim N; Demiray F; Sari A; Akpolat T
    Kidney Blood Press Res; 2009; 32(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 19622898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?
    Canzanello VJ; Jensen PL; Schwartz GL
    Arch Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 161(5):729-31. PubMed ID: 11231706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Calibration and safety of sphygmomanometers in health centers of Murcia].
    Antón JJ; Menárguez JF; Alcántara PA; Díaz MJ; Sánchez MC
    Aten Primaria; 1992 Oct; 10(6):817-20. PubMed ID: 1457703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The extent and implications of sphygmomanometer calibration error in primary care.
    Rouse A; Marshall T
    J Hum Hypertens; 2001 Sep; 15(9):587-91. PubMed ID: 11550103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How accurate are sphygmomanometers?
    Mion D; Pierin AM
    J Hum Hypertens; 1998 Apr; 12(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 9607693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between blood pressure readings using a mercury versus an aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Farhan K; Naqvi STS; Rizvi SAH; Zafar A; Rawala MS
    Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb; 25(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 31764009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical validation of aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Saxena Y; Saxena V; Gupta R
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23734440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring accuracy of sphygmomanometers in the medical practices of Swiss primary care physicians.
    Zuber M; Schäfer HH; Kaiser W; Erne P
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2013 Dec; 19(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 23822652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of Missouri aneroid sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure in patients with cancer.
    Ferreira KA; Santos AC; Arthur TC; Santos DA; Pereira D; Freitas EO; Fukuda FM; Baia WR
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 95(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20658091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sphygmomanometer calibration--why, how and how often?
    Turner MJ; Speechly C; Bignell N
    Aust Fam Physician; 2007 Oct; 36(10):834-8. PubMed ID: 17925905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternatives to the mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Buchanan S; Orris P; Karliner J
    J Public Health Policy; 2011 Feb; 32(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 21109765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of aneroid sphygmomanometers in clinical usage: University of Michigan experience.
    Yarows SA; Qian K
    Blood Press Monit; 2001 Apr; 6(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 11433131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a clinical trial setting.
    Ma Y; Temprosa M; Fowler S; Prineas RJ; Montez MG; Brown-Friday J; Carrion-Petersen ML; Whittington T;
    Am J Hypertens; 2009 Mar; 22(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 19057514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of monitors used for blood pressure checks in English retail pharmacies: a cross-sectional observational study.
    Hodgkinson J; Koshiaris C; Martin U; Mant J; Heneghan C; Hobbs FR; McManus RJ
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 May; 66(646):e309-14. PubMed ID: 27025555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of Panasonic EW3106 and EW3109 devices for blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
    Bonso E; Dorigatti F; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb; 15(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 20071978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.