166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16077268)
1. Differences in oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure measurements recorded by different revisions of the Philips Component Monitoring System.
Murray IC; Amoore JN; Scott DH
Blood Press Monit; 2005 Aug; 10(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 16077268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?
Amoore JN; Scott DH
Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 10828894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparability of oscillometric to simultaneous auscultatory blood pressure measurement in children.
Ringrose JS; Alabbas A; Jalali A; Khinda H; Morgan C; Yiu V; Alexander RT; Padwal R
Blood Press Monit; 2019 Apr; 24(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 30856623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.
Weaver MG; Park MK; Lee DH
Am J Dis Child; 1990 Aug; 144(8):911-4. PubMed ID: 2378339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of portable noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices: comparisons with intra-arterial and sphygmomanometer measurements.
Graettinger WF; Lipson JL; Cheung DG; Weber MA
Am Heart J; 1988 Oct; 116(4):1155-60. PubMed ID: 3177191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between invasive and noninvasive blood pressure measurements in critically ill patients receiving inotropes.
Kaur B; Kaur S; Yaddanapudi LN; Singh NV
Blood Press Monit; 2019 Feb; 24(1):24-29. PubMed ID: 30531494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Arterial blood pressure measurement with oscillometric instruments in newborns and infants].
Papadopoulos G; Oldörp B; Mieke S
Anaesthesist; 1994 Jul; 43(7):441-6. PubMed ID: 8092453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a simulator for the validation of noninvasive blood pressure-monitoring devices.
Doh I; Lim HK; Ahn B
Blood Press Monit; 2016 Jun; 21(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 26745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring from the supraorbital artery using an artificial neural network oscillometric algorithm.
Narus S; Egbert T; Lee TK; Lu J; Westenskow D
J Clin Monit; 1995 Sep; 11(5):289-97. PubMed ID: 7595684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A simulation study of the consistency of oscillometric blood pressure measurements with and without artefacts.
Amoore JN
Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 10828893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Study of the disparity of noninvasive and invasive blood pressure measured by the Philips Intellivue MP50 monitor in surgeries inducing gall cardiac reflex under general anesthesia.
Meng X; Zang G; Li R; Fan L; Liu J; Wang Z
Blood Press Monit; 2018 Feb; 23(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 29120887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the accuracy of non-invasive automatic blood pressure monitors.
Kawahara M
Anesth Prog; 1990; 37(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 2096748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoperative Blood Pressure Monitoring in Obese Patients.
Schumann R; Meidert AS; Bonney I; Koutentis C; Wesselink W; Kouz K; Saugel B
Anesthesiology; 2021 Feb; 134(2):179-188. PubMed ID: 33326001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation Between Blood Pressure Measurement by Non-invasive and Invasive Methods in Critically-ill Children.
Krishna BV; Das S; Sen S
Indian Pediatr; 2018 Apr; 55(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 29428917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring with concurrent auscultatory blood pressure in hemodialysis patients.
Semret M; Zidehsarai M; Agarwal R
Blood Press Monit; 2005 Oct; 10(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 16205443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of the measurement of mean arterial blood pressure using automatic oscillometers, arterial cannulation and auscultation.
Rutten AJ; Ilsley AH; Skowronski GA; Runciman WB
Anaesth Intensive Care; 1986 Feb; 14(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 3954015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
