525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16077422)
1. Tubular heart valves: a new tissue prosthesis design--preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis.
Cox JL; Ad N; Myers K; Gharib M; Quijano RC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 130(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 16077422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical experience with the 3F stentless aortic bioprosthesis: one-year follow up.
Linneweber J; Kossagk C; Rogge ML; Dushe S; Dohmen P; Konertz W
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 16901052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study.
Borger MA; Carson SM; Ivanov J; Rao V; Scully HE; Feindel CM; David TE
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Dec; 80(6):2180-5. PubMed ID: 16305867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hydrodynamic performance of the Medtronic Freestyle Aortic Root Bioprosthesis.
Yoganathan AP; Eberhardt CE; Walker PG
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Sep; 3(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 8000594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-vivo blood velocity and velocity gradient profiles downstream of stented and stentless aortic heart valves.
Funder JA; Frost MW; Ringgaard S; Klaaborg KE; Wierup P; Hjortdal V; Nygaard H; Hasenkam JM
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 20583391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.
Marquez S; Hon RT; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 11767190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration.
Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Jaussaud N; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 19414489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aortic root distensibility and cross-sectional areas in stented and subcoronary stentless bioprostheses in pigs.
Funder JA; Ringgaard S; Frost MW; Wierup P; Klaaborg KE; Hjortdal V; Nygaard H; Hasenkam JM
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 10(6):976-80. PubMed ID: 20357011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The subcoronary Toronto stentless versus supra-annular Perimount stented replacement aortic valve: early clinical and hemodynamic results of a randomized comparison in 160 patients.
Chambers JB; Rimington HM; Hodson F; Rajani R; Blauth CI
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):878-2. PubMed ID: 16580447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of Toronto stentless porcine valve in patients with aortic dilation.
Petracek MR; Shuman TA; Pirolo JS; Tedder M; Ball SK; Graves D
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):74-8. PubMed ID: 10660170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Turbulence downstream of subcoronary stentless and stented aortic valves.
Funder JA; Frost MW; Wierup P; Klaaborg KE; Hjortdal V; Nygaard H; Hasenkam JM
J Biomech; 2011 Aug; 44(12):2273-8. PubMed ID: 21696741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of an in vivo tissue-engineered, autologous heart valve (the biovalve): preparation of a prototype model.
Hayashida K; Kanda K; Yaku H; Ando J; Nakayama Y
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Jul; 134(1):152-9. PubMed ID: 17599501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of finite element analysis to the design of tissue leaflets for a percutaneous aortic valve.
Smuts AN; Blaine DC; Scheffer C; Weich H; Doubell AF; Dellimore KH
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Jan; 4(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 21094482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
