These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16078025)
1. Neuromagnetic responses to tactile stimulation of the fingers: Evidence for reduced cortical inhibition for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and children with epilepsy. Gaetz W; Jurkiewicz MT; Kessler SK; Blaskey L; Schwartz ES; Roberts TPL Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 16():624-633. PubMed ID: 28971012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetoencephalography reveals impaired sensory gating and change detection in older adults in the somatosensory system. Pesonen H; Strömmer J; Li X; Parkkari J; Tarkka IM; Astikainen P Neuropsychologia; 2023 Nov; 190():108702. PubMed ID: 37838067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stimulus awareness is associated with secondary somatosensory cortex activation in an inattentional numbness paradigm. Peters A; Bruchmann M; Dellert T; Moeck R; Schlossmacher I; Straube T Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):22575. PubMed ID: 38114726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Eye Closure on Anticipatory α Activity in a Tactile Discrimination Task. ElShafei HA; Orlemann C; Haegens S eNeuro; 2022; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 34965926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Automated Algorithm for the Identification of Somatosensory Cortex Using Magnetoencephalography. Tyner K; Das S; McCumber M; Alfatlawi M; Gliske SV Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38082586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields. Kakigi R; Hoshiyama M; Shimojo M; Naka D; Yamasaki H; Watanabe S; Xiang J; Maeda K; Lam K; Itomi K; Nakamura A Prog Neurobiol; 2000 Aug; 61(5):495-523. PubMed ID: 10748321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tracking functions of cortical networks on a millisecond timescale. Jousmäki V Neural Netw; 2000; 13(8-9):883-9. PubMed ID: 11156199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction of somatosensory evoked fields in the primary somatosensory cortex in a one-back task. Huonker R; Weiss T; Miltner WH Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):98-105. PubMed ID: 16078025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modality-independent reduction mechanisms of primary sensory evoked fields in a one-back task. Hanke D; Huonker R; Weiss T; Witte OW; Götz T Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):918-922. PubMed ID: 26436711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Task requirements change signal strength of the primary somatosensory M50: Oddball vs. one-back tasks. Götz T; Huonker R; Miltner WH; Witte OW; Dettner K; Weiss T Psychophysiology; 2011 Apr; 48(4):569-77. PubMed ID: 20735758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic source imaging of tactile input shows task-independent attention effects in SII. Hoechstetter K; Rupp A; Meinck HM; Weckesser D; Bornfleth H; Stippich C; Berg P; Scherg M Neuroreport; 2000 Aug; 11(11):2461-5. PubMed ID: 10943704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the number of pins and inter-pin distance on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following mechanical tactile stimulation. Onishi H; Sugawara K; Yamashiro K; Sato D; Suzuki M; Kirimoto H; Tamaki H; Murakami H; Kameyama S Brain Res; 2013 Oct; 1535():78-88. PubMed ID: 24001589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]