These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16078032)

  • 1. Saccadic search performance: the effect of element spacing.
    Vlaskamp BN; Over EA; Hooge IT
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(2):246-59. PubMed ID: 16078032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Target-distractor similarity has a larger impact on visual search in school-age children than spacing.
    Huurneman B; Boonstra FN
    J Vis; 2015 Jan; 15(1):15.1.23. PubMed ID: 25613761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spacing affects some but not all visual searches: implications for theories of attention and crowding.
    Reddy L; VanRullen R
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):3.1-17. PubMed ID: 18217818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coarse-to-fine eye movement strategy in visual search.
    Over EA; Hooge IT; Vlaskamp BN; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(17):2272-80. PubMed ID: 17617434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance.
    Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4118-33. PubMed ID: 17005231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: the effect of perceptual difficulty.
    Prinzmetal W; Zvinyatskovskiy A; Gutierrez P; Dilem L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):352-69. PubMed ID: 18609402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?
    Findlay JM; Blythe HI
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1267-74. PubMed ID: 18691610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new step towards understanding Embedded Figures Test performance in the autism spectrum: the radial frequency search task.
    Almeida RA; Dickinson JE; Maybery MT; Badcock JC; Badcock DR
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 19786040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The integration of parallel and serial processing mechanisms in visual search: evidence from eye movement recording.
    Maioli C; Benaglio I; Siri S; Sosta K; Cappa S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2001 Jan; 13(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 11168541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetries of saccadic eye movements in oriented-line-target search.
    Foster DH; Savage CJ; Mannan S; Ruddock KH
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 10768042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eye-movement control in direction-coded visual search.
    Greene HH; Rayner K
    Perception; 2001; 30(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 11296496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The spatio-temporal tuning of the mechanisms in the control of saccadic eye movements.
    White BJ; Kerzel D; Gegenfurtner KR
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3886-97. PubMed ID: 16879855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatiotemporal dynamics of perisaccadic remapping in humans revealed by classification images.
    Panichi M; Burr D; Morrone MC; Baldassi S
    J Vis; 2012 Apr; 12(4):11. PubMed ID: 22514332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying the performance limits of human saccadic targeting during visual search.
    Eckstein MP; Beutter BR; Stone LS
    Perception; 2001; 30(11):1389-401. PubMed ID: 11768491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2217-35. PubMed ID: 16497351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.
    Võ ML; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in orientation discrimination at the time of saccadic eye movements.
    Lee J; Lee C
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2213-23. PubMed ID: 18625267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of intraword and interword spacing on eye movements during reading: exploring the optimal use of space in a line of text.
    Slattery TJ; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1275-92. PubMed ID: 23709061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Training eye movements: can training people where to look hinder the processing of fixated objects?
    Dewhurst R; Crundall D
    Perception; 2008; 37(11):1729-44. PubMed ID: 19189735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.