These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1607819)

  • 1. [Effects of difference of occlusal splint contacts on masticatory system].
    Akishige S
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Mar; 59(1):160-80. PubMed ID: 1607819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of occlusal stabilization splint on the asymmetric activity of masticatory muscles in patients with temporomandibular dysfunction.
    Alajbeg IZ; Valentić-Peruzović M; Alajbeg I; Illes D
    Coll Antropol; 2003 Jun; 27(1):361-71. PubMed ID: 12974166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EMG response to alteration of tooth contacts on occlusal splints during maximal clenching.
    Wood WW; Tobias DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Mar; 51(3):394-6. PubMed ID: 6584610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of an occlusal splint on the electromyographic activities of the temporal and masseter muscles during maximal clenching in patients with a habit of nocturnal bruxism and signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorders.
    Holmgren K; Sheikholeslam A; Riise C; Kopp S
    J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Sep; 17(5):447-59. PubMed ID: 2231163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of occlusal splints on the asymmetry of masticatory muscle activity during maximal clenching.
    Abekura H; Kotani H; Tokuyama H; Hamada T
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Oct; 22(10):747-52. PubMed ID: 8606332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of canine guidance of maxillary occlusal splint on level of activation of masticatory muscles.
    Fitins D; Sheikholeslam A
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(6):235-41. PubMed ID: 8134892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of clenching intensity on bite force balance, occlusal contact area, and average bite pressure.
    Hidaka O; Iwasaki M; Saito M; Morimoto T
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1336-44. PubMed ID: 10403461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of an occlusal stabilization splint and the mode of visual feedback on the activity balance between jaw-elevator muscles during isometric contraction.
    Lobbezoo F; van der Glas HW; van Kampen FM; Bosman F
    J Dent Res; 1993 May; 72(5):876-82. PubMed ID: 8501285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of clenching level on intercuspal contact area in various regions of the dental arch.
    Gurdsapsri W; Ai M; Baba K; Fueki K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Mar; 27(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 10784336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Influences of changing vertical dimension, occlusal contacts of bite plane and body position on masticatory muscle activities].
    Yoshida M
    Osaka Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1990 Jun; 35(1):287-306. PubMed ID: 2135409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term effect of a stabilization splint on the asymmetry of submaximal masticatory muscle activity.
    McCarroll RS; Naeije M; Kim YK; Hansson TL
    J Oral Rehabil; 1989 Mar; 16(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 2715865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of jaw clenching while wearing an occlusal splint on awareness of tiredness, bite force, and EEG power spectrum.
    Narita N; Funato M; Ishii T; Kamiya K; Matsumoto T
    J Prosthodont Res; 2009 Jul; 53(3):120-5. PubMed ID: 19345662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dental stability and maximal masticatory muscle activity.
    Jiménez ID
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Nov; 14(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 3481398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response patterns of craniomandibular muscles with and without alterations in sensory feedback.
    Nielsen I; Miller AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Mar; 59(3):352-62. PubMed ID: 3162276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of variation in anteroposterior occlusal contacts on electromyographic activity.
    Manns A; Miralles R; Valdivia J; Bull R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 May; 61(5):617-23. PubMed ID: 2746532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of changing occlusal support on jaw-closing muscle electromyographic activity in healthy men and women.
    Wang MQ; He JJ; Wang K; Svensson P
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 19291503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Masticatory muscle activity in different jaw relations during submaximal clenching efforts.
    Visser A; McCarroll RS; Naeije M
    J Dent Res; 1992 Feb; 71(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 1556295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative electromyographic study of bite plates and stabilization splints.
    Dahlström L; Haraldson T; Janson ST
    Scand J Dent Res; 1985 Jun; 93(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 3860912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of different narrative instructions to record the occlusal contact with silicone registration materials.
    Obara R; Komiyama O; Iida T; Asano T; De Laat A; Kawara M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Mar; 41(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 24447195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occlusal force distribution on the dental arch during various levels of clenching.
    Kumagai H; Suzuki T; Hamada T; Sondang P; Fujitani M; Nikawa H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Dec; 26(12):932-5. PubMed ID: 10620156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.