These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
601 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16078388)
61. Maximum likelihood estimation in survival studies under progressive interval censoring with random removals. Xiang L; Tse SK J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):981-91. PubMed ID: 16279356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. The effect of the heterogeneity variance estimator on some tests of treatment efficacy. Makambi KH J Biopharm Stat; 2004 May; 14(2):439-49. PubMed ID: 15206538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation. Partlett C; Riley RD Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):301-317. PubMed ID: 27714841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. A comparison of methods for meta-analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes. Mathes T; Kuss O Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):366-381. PubMed ID: 29573180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses. Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Avoiding zero between-study variance estimates in random-effects meta-analysis. Chung Y; Rabe-Hesketh S; Choi IH Stat Med; 2013 Oct; 32(23):4071-89. PubMed ID: 23670939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. An application of targeted maximum likelihood estimation to the meta-analysis of safety data. Gruber S; van der Laan MJ Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):254-62. PubMed ID: 23379761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Synthesizing single-case studies: a Monte Carlo examination of a three-level meta-analytic model. Owens CM; Ferron JM Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 22180105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials. Donner A; Piaggio G; Villar J Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Oct; 10(5):325-38. PubMed ID: 11697225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation. López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Hedges LV; Tipton E; Johnson MC Res Synth Methods; 2010 Jan; 1(1):39-65. PubMed ID: 26056092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Drop-outs and a random regression model. Overall JE J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Jul; 7(3):383-402. PubMed ID: 9252832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and spss. Tanner-Smith EE; Tipton E Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 26054023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. A note on the empirical Bayes heterogeneity variance estimator in meta-analysis. Sidik K; Jonkman JN Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(20):3804-3816. PubMed ID: 31209917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. A bivariate approach to meta-analysis. Van Houwelingen HC; Zwinderman KH; Stijnen T Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(24):2273-84. PubMed ID: 7907813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]