599 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16078737)
1. [Effect of population size of performance test on short-term selection result of sire line].
Zhang H; Li JQ; Wang C; Liu XH; Chen YS
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Jul; 32(7):696-703. PubMed ID: 16078737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of genetic selection on management of boar replacement.
Robinson JA; Buhr MM
Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 15626424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of sow longevity and trait associations with sow longevity.
Serenius T; Stalder KJ; Baas TJ; Mabry JW; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Robison OW; Tokach M; Miller RK
J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2590-5. PubMed ID: 16908665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlated responses of pre- and postweaning growth and backfat thickness to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
Rosendo A; Canario L; Druet T; Gogué J; Bidanel JP
J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3209-17. PubMed ID: 17609463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: body condition, skin lesions, and performance.
Salak-Johnson JL; Niekamp SR; Rodriguez-Zas SL; Ellis M; Curtis SE
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1758-69. PubMed ID: 17371790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows.
Bergsma R; Kanis E; Verstegen MW; Knol EF
J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1067-80. PubMed ID: 18192550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits.
Gilbert H; Bidanel JP; Gruand J; Caritez JC; Billon Y; Guillouet P; Lagant H; Noblet J; Sellier P
J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3182-8. PubMed ID: 17785600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of feeding schedule on body condition, aggressiveness, and reproductive failure in group-housed sows.
Schneider JD; Tokach MD; Dritz SS; Nelssen JL; Derouchey JM; Goodband RD
J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3462-9. PubMed ID: 17785592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig reproductive traits.
Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2303-15. PubMed ID: 12350007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
Rosendo A; Druet T; Gogué J; Canario L; Bidanel JP
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1615-24. PubMed ID: 17371794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sow line differences in heat stress tolerance expressed in reproductive performance traits.
Bloemhof S; van der Waaij EH; Merks JW; Knol EF
J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3330-7. PubMed ID: 18708608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selection for litter size at day five to improve litter size at weaning and piglet survival rate.
Su G; Lund MS; Sorensen D
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jun; 85(6):1385-92. PubMed ID: 17339413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multivariate analysis of litter size for multiple parities with production traits in pigs: II. Response to selection for litter size and correlated response to production traits.
Noguera JL; Varona L; Babot D; Estany J
J Anim Sci; 2002 Oct; 80(10):2548-55. PubMed ID: 12413076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genomic selection for maternal traits in pigs.
Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):3908-16. PubMed ID: 21841086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of errors in pedigree on three methods of estimating breeding value for litter size, backfat and average daily gain in swine.
Long TE; Johnson RK; Keele JW
J Anim Sci; 1990 Dec; 68(12):4069-78. PubMed ID: 2286549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Results from nine generations of selection for increased litter size in swine.
Holl JW; Robison OW
J Anim Sci; 2003 Mar; 81(3):624-9. PubMed ID: 12661642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breeding replacement gilts for organic pig herds.
Leenhouwers JI; Ten Napel J; Hanenberg EH; Merks JW
Animal; 2011 Feb; 5(4):615-21. PubMed ID: 22439958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The addition of ground wheat straw as a fiber source in the gestation diet of sows and the effect on sow and litter performance for three successive parities.
Veum TL; Crenshaw JD; Crenshaw TD; Cromwell GL; Easter RA; Ewan RC; Nelssen JL; Miller ER; Pettigrew JE; Ellersieck MR;
J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):1003-12. PubMed ID: 18952734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of selection of data on estimates of breeding values by three methods for litter size, backfat, and average daily gain in swine.
Long TE; Johnson RK; Keele JW
J Anim Sci; 1991 Jul; 69(7):2787-94. PubMed ID: 1885391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
