These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16079817)

  • 81. Impact factors: just part of a research treadmill.
    de Meis L; do Carmo MS; de Meis C
    Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6950):723. PubMed ID: 12917657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. [Distortions and distractions in the scientific activity].
    De Marchi B
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(2):134-5. PubMed ID: 22706368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Focus on fraud. Where are they now?
    Basu P
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492-3. PubMed ID: 16675982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Preliminary inquiry clears brain scientist of fraud allegation.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6946):243. PubMed ID: 12867948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Face up to fraud.
    Nature; 2012 Jan; 481(7381):237-8. PubMed ID: 22258568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. An unwelcome discovery. Walter DeNino was a young lab technician who analyzed data for his mentor, Eric Poehlman. What he found was that Poehlman was not the scientist he appeared to be.
    Interlandi J
    N Y Times Mag; 2006 Oct; ():98-103. PubMed ID: 17115505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. The dilemma of the honest researcher.
    Steneck NH
    EMBO Rep; 2011 Jul; 12(8):745. PubMed ID: 21799526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Your cheatin' heart.
    Cyranoski D
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):490. PubMed ID: 16675979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Do researchers learn to practice misbehavior?
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(2):4. PubMed ID: 16604884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. A simple system of checks and balances to cut fraud.
    Yang X; Eggan K; Seidel G; Jaenisch R; Melton D
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Misconduct ruling is silent on intent.
    Reich ES
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):189-90. PubMed ID: 22972273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Catching the crooks.
    Marris E
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):491. PubMed ID: 16675981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Stop misbehaving!
    Neill US
    J Clin Invest; 2006 Jul; 116(7):1740-1. PubMed ID: 16823470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Anthropologists split over misconduct claims.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6867):5. PubMed ID: 11780079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Solutions, not scapegoats.
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):957. PubMed ID: 18563095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Confidentiality is essential in misconduct inquiries.
    Mason S; Rutledge C
    Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7135):492. PubMed ID: 17392764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Scientific misconduct, stem cells, and the way ahead.
    Lindblad WJ
    Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(2):101. PubMed ID: 16630096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Plagiarize or perish?
    Ready T
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Should journals police scientific fraud?
    Marris E
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Misconduct: lower ranks take most of the blame.
    Clouthier SG
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7050):460. PubMed ID: 16049448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.