These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1608001)
1. Osseous healing of the sagittal ramus osteotomy: a histologic comparison of rigid and nonrigid fixation in Macaca mulatta. Ellis E; Carlson DS; Billups J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Jul; 50(7):718-23. PubMed ID: 1608001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mobility of the mandible following advancement and maxillomandibular or rigid internal fixation: an experimental investigation in Macaca mulatta. Ellis E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1988 Feb; 46(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 3422279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stability of the mandible following advancement: a comparison of three postsurgical fixation techniques. Ellis E; Reynolds S; Carlson DS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Jul; 94(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 3164581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histologic examination of the temporomandibular joint after mandibular advancement with and without rigid fixation: an experimental investigation in adult Macaca mulatta. Ellis E; Hinton RJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1991 Dec; 49(12):1316-27. PubMed ID: 1955923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandibular anatomy as it relates to rigid fixation of the sagittal ramus split osteotomy. Smith BR; Rajchel JL; Waite DE; Read L J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1991 Mar; 49(3):222-6; discussion 227. PubMed ID: 1995810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability of sagittal split osteotomies. A comparison of three stabilization techniques. Perrott DH; Lu YF; Pogrel MA; Kaban LB Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Dec; 78(6):696-704. PubMed ID: 7898905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of temporomandibular symptoms following mandibular advancement by bilateral sagittal split osteotomies: rigid versus nonrigid fixation. Flynn B; Brown DT; Lapp TH; Bussard DA; Roberts WE Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Sep; 70(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 2216372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability of simultaneous maxillary intrusion and mandibular advancement: a comparison of rigid and nonrigid fixation techniques. Skoczylas LJ; Ellis E; Fonseca RJ; Gallo WJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1988 Dec; 46(12):1056-64. PubMed ID: 3193281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of screw placement patterns on the rigidity of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy: technical note. Kim HC; Essaki S; Kameyama T J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1995 Feb; 23(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 7699086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of postoperative stability after BSSRO to correct facial asymmetry depending on the amount of bone contact between the proximal and distal segment. Yang HJ; Hwang SJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e165-70. PubMed ID: 24011465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery. Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in monkeys: a comparison of monocortical and bicortical fixation. Hu J; Zhao Q; Tang J; Zheng Z; Qi MC Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 45(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 17027127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of condylar position following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with wire fixation or rigid fixation. Stroster TG; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 8006484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandibular range of motion with rigid/nonrigid fixation. Aragon SB; Van Sickels JE Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Apr; 63(4):408-11. PubMed ID: 3472138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electromyography of the suprahyoid musculature following mandibular advancement with and without rigid fixation. Ellis E; Dechow PC; Carlson DS; LaRoche V J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1990 Jan; 48(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2294212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Superior repositioning of the maxilla combined with mandibular advancement: mandibular RIF improves stability. Forssell K; Turvey TA; Phillips C; Proffit WR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Oct; 102(4):342-50. PubMed ID: 1456219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal placement of bicortical screws in sagittal split-ramus osteotomy of mandible. Obeid G; Lindquist CC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jun; 71(6):665-9. PubMed ID: 2062519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of stimulated bite force after mandibular advancement using rigid and nonrigid fixation. Ellis E; Dechow PC; Carlson DS J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1988 Jan; 46(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 3422267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback. Proffit WR; Phillips C; Dann C; Turvey TA Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 1940541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment. Ricard D; Ferri J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]