214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16080170)
1. An in vivo study of the host response to starch-based polymers and composites subcutaneously implanted in rats.
Marques AP; Reis RL; Hunt JA
Macromol Biosci; 2005 Aug; 5(8):775-85. PubMed ID: 16080170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro assessment of the enzymatic degradation of several starch based biomaterials.
Azevedo HS; Gama FM; Reis RL
Biomacromolecules; 2003; 4(6):1703-12. PubMed ID: 14606899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modulating bone cells response onto starch-based biomaterials by surface plasma treatment and protein adsorption.
Alves CM; Yang Y; Carnes DL; Ong JL; Sylvia VL; Dean DD; Agrawal CM; Reis RL
Biomaterials; 2007 Jan; 28(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 17011619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative immunohistochemical examination of the local cellular reactions following implantation of biomaterials.
Walschus U; Hoene A; Kochanowski A; Neukirch B; Patrzyk M; Wilhelm L; Schröder K; Schlosser M
J Microsc; 2011 Apr; 242(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 21118237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The biocompatibility of novel starch-based polymers and composites: in vitro studies.
Marques AP; Reis RL; Hunt JA
Biomaterials; 2002 Mar; 23(6):1471-8. PubMed ID: 11829443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo short-term and long-term host reaction to starch-based scaffolds.
Santos TC; Marques AP; Höring B; Martins AR; Tuzlakoglu K; Castro AG; van Griensven M; Reis RL
Acta Biomater; 2010 Nov; 6(11):4314-26. PubMed ID: 20601228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo response to starch-based scaffolds designed for bone tissue engineering applications.
Salgado AJ; Coutinho OP; Reis RL; Davies JE
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Mar; 80(4):983-9. PubMed ID: 17109411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microhardness of starch based biomaterials in simulated physiological conditions.
Alves NM; Saiz-Arroyo C; Rodriguez-Perez MA; Reis RL; Mano JF
Acta Biomater; 2007 Jan; 3(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 16996331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biocompatibility and safety evaluation of a ricinoleic acid-based poly(ester-anhydride) copolymer after implantation in rats.
Vaisman B; Motiei M; Nyska A; Domb AJ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Feb; 92(2):419-31. PubMed ID: 19191319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of starch-based biomaterials on the in vitro proliferation and viability of osteoblast-like cells.
Marques AP; Cruz HR; Coutinho OP; Reis RL
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2005 Sep; 16(9):833-42. PubMed ID: 16167112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers and composites proposed for internal fixation of bone.
Daniels AU; Chang MK; Andriano KP
J Appl Biomater; 1990; 1(1):57-78. PubMed ID: 10148987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chitosan improves the biological performance of soy-based biomaterials.
Santos TC; Marques AP; Silva SS; Oliveira JM; Mano JF; Castro AG; van Griensven M; Reis RL
Tissue Eng Part A; 2010 Sep; 16(9):2883-90. PubMed ID: 20486796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surface structural investigation of starch-based biomaterials.
Pashkuleva I; Azevedo HS; Reis RL
Macromol Biosci; 2008 Feb; 8(2):210-9. PubMed ID: 17849430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose.
Helenius G; Bäckdahl H; Bodin A; Nannmark U; Gatenholm P; Risberg B
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Feb; 76(2):431-8. PubMed ID: 16278860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tissue reaction and biodegradation of implanted cross-linked high amylose starch in rats.
Désévaux C; Dubreuil P; Lenaerts V; Girard C
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(6):772-9. PubMed ID: 12418023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of starch-based biomaterials on leukocyte adhesion and activation in vitro.
Marques AP; Reis RL; Hunt JA
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2005 Nov; 16(11):1029-43. PubMed ID: 16388384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo induction of macrophage Ia antigen (MHC class II) expression by biomedical polymers in the cage implant system.
Petillo O; Peluso G; Ambrosio L; Nicolais L; Kao WJ; Anderson JM
J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 May; 28(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 8027104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biocompatibility of different poly(lactide-coglycolide) polymers implanted into the subconjunctival space in rats.
Rönkkö S; Kaarniranta K; Kalesnykas G; Uusitalo H
Ophthalmic Res; 2011; 46(2):55-65. PubMed ID: 21228610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduced foreign body reaction to implanted biomaterials by surface treatment with oriented osteopontin.
Liu L; Chen G; Chao T; Ratner BD; Sage EH; Jiang S
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2008; 19(6):821-35. PubMed ID: 18534099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alkaline treatments to render starch-based biodegradable polymers self-mineralizable.
Leonor IB; Kim HM; Balas F; Kawashita M; Reis RL; Kokubo T; Nakamura T
J Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2007; 1(6):425-35. PubMed ID: 18181243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
