101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16080318)
1. Science & justice--DNA and the courts.
Sedley S
Sci Justice; 2005; 45(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 16080318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Courts reject DNA fingerprinting, citing controversy after NAS report.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Oct; 359(6394):349. PubMed ID: 1406941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Crime and punishment.
Opar A
Nat Med; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1110-1. PubMed ID: 17024196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Advancing justice for sexual assault survivors and innocent inmates, or threat to privacy? A controversial DNA technology proposal.
Hackenschmidt A
J Emerg Nurs; 2004 Dec; 30(6):575-7. PubMed ID: 15565046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing Fourth Amendment challenges to DNA extraction statutes after Samson v. California.
Nerko CJ
Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Nov; 77(2):917-49. PubMed ID: 19353834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Organic Law 15/2003, of 25 November, modifying the Organic Law 10/1995, of 23 November, on the Penal Code].
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):267-8. PubMed ID: 15032109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Context-free forensic science.
Forrest R
Sci Justice; 2004; 44(2):63. PubMed ID: 15112592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal perceptions of forensic DNA profiling part I: a review of the legal literature.
Walsh SJ
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Dec; 155(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 16216711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Science and justice from a prosecutor's perspective.
Calvert-Smith D
Sci Justice; 2001; 41(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 11393942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Conference report: "Different opinions of the Institutes of Forensic Medicine about the classification of disease stages," Osieczna near Cracow, June 20-21, 2001].
Kunz J; Gross A; Kowalski P
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2002; 52(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 14669662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Organic Law 10/2007, of October 8, regulating the police database on identifiers obtained from DNA: historic background and genetic view].
García O
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2007; (27):181-203. PubMed ID: 18330105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Congress reviews DNA testing.
Aldhous P
Nature; 1991 Jun; 351(6329):684. PubMed ID: 2062360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Letter to the Editor--The prosecutor's fallacy in George Clarke's Justice and Science: Trials and Triumphs of DNA Evidence.
Thompson WC
J Forensic Sci; 2009 Mar; 54(2):504; author reply 505. PubMed ID: 19261061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Manufacturing convictions: why defendants are entitled to the data underlying forensic DNA kits.
Mellon JN
Duke Law J; 2001 Dec; 51(3):1097-137. PubMed ID: 11944660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Juries and crime labs: correcting the weak links in the DNA chain.
McDonald R
Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(2-3):345-63. PubMed ID: 9702277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Will DNA profiling fuel prejudice?
Gosline A
New Sci; 2005 Apr 9-15; 186(2494):12-3. PubMed ID: 16007760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Promega Corporation reveals primer sequences in its testing kits.
Masibay A; Mozer TJ; Sprecher C
J Forensic Sci; 2000 Nov; 45(6):1360-2. PubMed ID: 11110204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The DNA paternity test: legislating the future paternity action.
Shapiro ED; Reifler S; Psome CL
Leg Med; 1993; ():233-82. PubMed ID: 7907160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The challenge of identifying deceased individuals in Brazil: from dictatorship to DNA analysis.
Guimarães MA
Sci Justice; 2003; 43(4):215-7. PubMed ID: 14714290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of forensic DNA testing in the legal system.
Primorac D; Schanfield MS
Croat Med J; 2000 Mar; 41(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 10810166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
