131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16080477)
1. Accuracy rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Bonifacino A; Petrocelli V; Pisani T; Giannerini S; Giovagnoli A; Vecchione A; Mingazzini PL; Giovagnoli MR
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(3c):2465-70. PubMed ID: 16080477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions in a rural setting. Comparison of cytology with imaging and final outcome.
Zardawi IM; Hearnden F; Meyer P; Trevan B
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 10097704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G
Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance of fine needle aspiration cytology and vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy for small breast lesions.
Nakano S; Otsuka M; Mibu A; Oinuma T
Clin Breast Cancer; 2015 Feb; 15(1):e23-6. PubMed ID: 25159893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. False-negative ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of the breast: difference with US-detected and MRI-detected lesions.
Sakamoto N; Tozaki M; Higa K; Abe S; Ozaki S; Fukuma E
Breast Cancer; 2010 Apr; 17(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 19434473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 concecutive cases of missed breast cancer.
Shah VI; Raju U; Chitale D; Deshpande V; Gregory N; Strand V
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1824-31. PubMed ID: 12673707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of positive core wash cytology to estimate potential risk of needle tract seeding of breast cancer: directional vacuum-assisted biopsy versus automated core needle biopsy.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
Breast Cancer; 2010; 17(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 19360459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contribution of ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology to the differential diagnosis of palpable solid breast lesions.
Reinikainen HT; Rissanen TJ; Piippo UK; Päivänsalo MJ
Acta Radiol; 1999 Jul; 40(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 10394865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic pitfalls of fine needle aspiration cytology for breast disease.
Kerin MJ; McAnena OJ; Waldron RP; McGuire M; Given HF
Ir Med J; 1993 May; 86(3):100-1. PubMed ID: 8567233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Breast calcifications with percutaneous vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of malignancy or atypical hyerplasia: correlations with surgical findings].
Piubello Q; Montemezzi S; D'Atri C
Pathologica; 2002 Dec; 94(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 12540993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management].
Kocjan G
Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparision of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy according to tumor size of suspicious breast lesions.
Barra Ade A; Gobbi H; de L Rezende CA; Gouvêa AP; de Lucena CE; Reis JH; Costa e Silva SZ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Jan; 36(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 18064684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Fine needle aspiration biopsy of breast lesions: institutional experience].
Medina-Franco H; Abarca-Pérez L; Cortés-González R; Soto-Germes S; Ulloa JA; Uribe N
Rev Invest Clin; 2005; 57(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 16187698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid on-site evaluation of axillary fine-needle aspiration cytology in breast cancer.
O'Leary DP; O'Brien O; Relihan N; McCarthy J; Ryan M; Barry J; Kelly LM; Redmond HP
Br J Surg; 2012 Jun; 99(6):807-12. PubMed ID: 22473359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound-guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy in the assessment of C3 breast lesions by ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology: results and costs in comparison with surgery.
Abbate F; Bacigalupo L; Latronico A; Trentin C; Penco S; Menna S; Viale G; Cassano E; Bellomi M
Breast; 2009 Apr; 18(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19342236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast procedures guided by magnetic resonance imaging.
David J; Trop I; Lalonde L
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2005 Dec; 56(5):309-18. PubMed ID: 16579025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Imprint cytology from ultrasound-guided core biopsies: accurate and immediate diagnosis in a one-stop breast clinic.
Jones L; Lott MF; Calder CJ; Kutt E
Clin Radiol; 2004 Oct; 59(10):903-8. PubMed ID: 15451349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of trucut biopsy with fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Yong WS; Chia KH; Poh WT; Wong CY
Singapore Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(9):587-9. PubMed ID: 10628249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
