85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16080547)
1. New diagnostic imaging of gastointestinal tumors: a preliminary study of three-dimensional tumor structure and volumetry.
Kikuchi S; Kida M; Kobayashi K; Yano T; Sakuramoto S; Watanabe M; Kubota K; Isobe Y
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(4):2935-41. PubMed ID: 16080547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pre-operative tumor assessment of patients with gastric cancer based on virtual endoscopy using multidetector-row computer tomography.
Kikuchi S; Futawatari N; Sakuramoto S; Watanabe M; Kubota K; Sasaki M; Murata K; Kida M
Anticancer Res; 2006; 26(6C):4641-5. PubMed ID: 17214320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Usefulness of three-dimensional, multidetector row CT (virtual gastroscopy and multiplanar reconstruction) in the evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison with conventional endoscopy, EUS, and histopathology.
Bhandari S; Shim CS; Kim JH; Jung IS; Cho JY; Lee JS; Lee MS; Kim BS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 May; 59(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 15114303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A preliminary study on pre-operative tumor volumetry measured by three-dimensional computer tomography in gastric cancer.
Kikuchi S; Mieno H; Moriya H; Hosoda K; Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Kubota K; Matsunaga K
Hepatogastroenterology; 2015; 62(137):214-8. PubMed ID: 25911898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasonography compared with conventional ultrasonography and computed tomography in preoperative rectal cancer staging.
Kim JC; Kim HC; Yu CS; Han KR; Kim JR; Lee KH; Jang SJ; Lee SS; Ha HK
Am J Surg; 2006 Jul; 192(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 16769283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volume measurement using tissue characterization of three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonographic images.
Yoshino J; Nakazawa S; Inui K; Wakabayashi T; Okushima K; Kobayashi T; Nakamura S; Watanabe S; Asakura N
Endoscopy; 2000 Aug; 32(8):624-9. PubMed ID: 10935791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between CT volume measurement and histopathological assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.
Pomerri F; Pucciarelli S; Gennaro G; Maretto I; Nitti D; Muzzio PC
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3918-24. PubMed ID: 22902408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT and endoscopic ultrasound in comparison to endoluminal MRI: preliminary results in staging gastric carcinoma.
Heye T; Kuntz C; Düx M; Encke J; Palmowski M; Autschbach F; Volke F; Kauffmann GW; Grenacher L
Eur J Radiol; 2009 May; 70(2):336-41. PubMed ID: 18337043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT evaluation of gastric lesions with three-dimensional display and interactive virtual endoscopy: comparison with conventional barium study and endoscopy.
Ogata I; Komohara Y; Yamashita Y; Mitsuzaki K; Takahashi M; Ogawa M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1263-70. PubMed ID: 10227500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cross-sectional imaging of gastric neoplasia.
Hargunani R; Maclachlan J; Kaniyur S; Power N; Pereira SP; Malhotra A
Clin Radiol; 2009 Apr; 64(4):420-9. PubMed ID: 19264188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Value of endosonography in diagnostic staging of primary gastric lymphoma (MALT type)].
Hoepffner N; Lahme T; Gilly J; Menzel J; Koch P; Foerster EC
Med Klin (Munich); 2003 Jun; 98(6):313-7. PubMed ID: 12811415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rectal cancer: assessment of complete response to preoperative combined radiation therapy with chemotherapy--conventional MR volumetry versus diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
Curvo-Semedo L; Lambregts DM; Maas M; Thywissen T; Mehsen RT; Lammering G; Beets GL; Caseiro-Alves F; Beets-Tan RG
Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):734-43. PubMed ID: 21673229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of proximal rectal cancer.
Harewood GC; Wiersema MJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Apr; 97(4):874-82. PubMed ID: 12003422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a three-dimensional freehand endorectal ultrasound system for use in rectal cancer imaging.
Warmath JR; Bao P; Clements LW; Herline AJ; Galloway RL
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1757-66. PubMed ID: 16013733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Endosonography in diagnosis and staging of malignant tumors of the stomach. A prospective comparative study between endosonography, computerized tomography and conventional ultrasonography].
Nattermann C; Dancygier H
Z Gastroenterol; 1993 Dec; 31(12):719-26. PubMed ID: 8310725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multimodal imaging of esophagus and cardia cancer before and after treatment.
Fiore D; Baggio V; Ruol A; Bocus P; Casara D; Corti L; Muzzio PC
Radiol Med; 2006 Sep; 111(6):804-17. PubMed ID: 16896560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating local lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging, endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Li XT; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K; Zhang XY
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):O129-35. PubMed ID: 25628186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed tomography or endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative staging of gastric and esophageal tumors.
Greenberg J; Durkin M; Van Drunen M; Aranha GV
Surgery; 1994 Oct; 116(4):696-701; discussion 701-2. PubMed ID: 7940168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrepancy in diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumor among esophagogastroduodenoscopy, CT, and endoscopic ultrasonography: a retrospective analysis of 93 consecutive cases.
Goto O; Kambe H; Niimi K; Mochizuki S; Asada-Hirayama I; Minatsuki C; Ono S; Kodashima S; Yamamichi N; Yamaji Y; Fujishiro M; Koike K
Abdom Imaging; 2012 Dec; 37(6):1074-8. PubMed ID: 22752557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].
Golfieri R; Giampalma E; Leo P; Colecchia A; Selleri S; Poggioli G; Gandolfi L; Gozzetti G; Trebbi F; Russo A
Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
