These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16080700)

  • 1. Combining multiple quantitative and qualitative goals when assessing biomanufacturing strategies under uncertainty.
    Farid SS; Washbrook J; Titchener-Hooker NJ
    Biotechnol Prog; 2005; 21(4):1183-91. PubMed ID: 16080700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision-support tool for assessing biomanufacturing strategies under uncertainty: stainless steel versus disposable equipment for clinical trial material preparation.
    Farid SS; Washbrook J; Titchener-Hooker NJ
    Biotechnol Prog; 2005; 21(2):486-97. PubMed ID: 15801789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of a decision-support tool to assess pooling strategies in perfusion culture processes under uncertainty.
    Lim AC; Zhou Y; Washbrook J; Sinclair A; Fish B; Francis R; Titchener-Hooker NJ; Farid SS
    Biotechnol Prog; 2005; 21(4):1231-42. PubMed ID: 16080707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A computer-aided approach to compare the production economics of fed-batch and perfusion culture under uncertainty.
    Lim AC; Washbrook J; Titchener-Hooker NJ; Farid SS
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2006 Mar; 93(4):687-97. PubMed ID: 16259001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fed-batch and perfusion culture processes: economic, environmental, and operational feasibility under uncertainty.
    Pollock J; Ho SV; Farid SS
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2013 Jan; 110(1):206-19. PubMed ID: 22806692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the value for money of changing clinical practice change: a stochastic application in diabetes care.
    Hoomans T; Abrams KR; Ament AJ; Evers SM; Severens JL
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19648827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prioritization of sediment management alternatives using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis.
    Alvarez-Guerra M; Canis L; Voulvoulis N; Viguri JR; Linkov I
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4354-67. PubMed ID: 20673964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Waste management project's alternatives: A risk-based multi-criteria assessment (RBMCA) approach.
    Karmperis AC; Sotirchos A; Aravossis K; Tatsiopoulos IP
    Waste Manag; 2012 Jan; 32(1):194-212. PubMed ID: 21982588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A methodology for the comparative evaluation of alternative bioseparation technologies.
    Tran R; Zhou Y; Lacki KM; Titchener-Hooker NJ
    Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(5):1007-25. PubMed ID: 19194909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A combined Monte Carlo and possibilistic approach to uncertainty propagation in event tree analysis.
    Baraldi P; Zio E
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1309-26. PubMed ID: 18631304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scenario approach for assessing the utility of dispersal information in decision support for aerially spread plant pathogens, applied to Phytophthora infestans.
    Skelsey P; Rossing WA; Kessel GJ; van der Werf W
    Phytopathology; 2009 Jul; 99(7):887-95. PubMed ID: 19522587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A distance-based uncertainty analysis approach to multi-criteria decision analysis for water resource decision making.
    Hyde KM; Maier HR; Colby CB
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Dec; 77(4):278-90. PubMed ID: 16288957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The development and application of multi-criteria decision-making tool with consideration of uncertainty: the selection of a management strategy for the bio-degradable fraction in the municipal solid waste.
    El Hanandeh A; El-Zein A
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jan; 101(2):555-61. PubMed ID: 19736003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management.
    Thorneloe SA; Weitz K; Jambeck J
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):1006-20. PubMed ID: 17433663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining the cost of reducing uncertainty with the selection of risk assessment models for remediation decision of site contamination.
    Chen YC; Ma HW
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Mar; 141(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 16926066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of stochastic multiattribute analysis to assessment of single walled carbon nanotube synthesis processes.
    Canis L; Linkov I; Seager TP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(22):8704-11. PubMed ID: 20964398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Separating the wheat from the chaff: the effective use of mathematical models as decision tools.
    Glaser D; Bridges TS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jul; 3(3):442-9. PubMed ID: 17695115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reflections on uncertainty in risk assessment and risk management by the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) precautionary principle workgroup.
    Sanderson H; Stahl CH; Irwin R; Rogers MD
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):73-9. PubMed ID: 16304937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does concern-driven risk management provide a viable alternative to QRA?
    Cox LA
    Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 17362398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.