452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16080901)
1. [The relationship between central corneal thickness and Perkins applanation tonometry in rabbits].
Luan CS; Chen XM; Deng YP; Wang L; Liu DJ; Cui M; Li J
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 41(7):642-6. PubMed ID: 16080901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Underestimate of tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy increases at higher intraocular pressure levels.
Tamburrelli C; Giudiceandrea A; Vaiano AS; Caputo CG; Gullà F; Salgarello T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Sep; 46(9):3208-13. PubMed ID: 16123420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Applanation tonometry in "normal" patients and patients after LASIK].
Kohlhaas M; Spörl E; Böhm AG; Pollack K; Sandner D; Pillunat LE
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Oct; 222(10):823-6. PubMed ID: 16240277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of rebound tonometer and Goldmann handheld applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Saenz-Frances F; Vizzeri G; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 19142135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midperipheral corneal thickness affects noncontact tonometry.
Hamilton K
J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(8):623-7. PubMed ID: 19223787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Correlation of intraocular pressure measured by applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry and TonoPen with central corneal thickness].
Burdová MC; Ferrová K; Filous A; Oskorypová K; Lezatková P; Sedlácková P
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2011; 67(5-6):154-7. PubMed ID: 22448415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correction of intraocular pressure for changes in central corneal thickness following photorefractive keratectomy.
Munger R; Hodge WG; Mintsioulis G; Agapitos PJ; Jackson WB; Damji KF
Can J Ophthalmol; 1998 Apr; 33(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 9606572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diurnal variation of central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry estimates of intraocular pressure.
Hamilton KE; Pye DC; Aggarwala S; Evian S; Khosla J; Perera R
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 17224746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Analysis of intraocular pressure after myopic photorefractive keratectomy].
Wu X; Liu S; Huang P; Wang P
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Oct; 38(10):603-5. PubMed ID: 12487909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Pakrou N; Gray T; Mills R; Landers J; Craig J
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
Ko YC; Liu CJ; Hsu WM
Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure.
Broman AT; Congdon NG; Bandeen-Roche K; Quigley HA
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 18091174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Ku JY; Danesh-Meyer HV; Craig JP; Gamble GD; McGhee CN
Eye (Lond); 2006 Feb; 20(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15803173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy on the accuracy of pneumatonometer readings in rabbits.
Tuunanen TH; Hämäläinen P; Mali M; Oksala O; Tervo T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Aug; 37(9):1810-4. PubMed ID: 8759348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Perkins handheld applanation tonometer in the measurement of intraocular pressure in dogs and cats.
Andrade SF; Cremonezi T; Zachi CA; Lonchiati CF; Amatuzzi JD; Sakamoto KP; Mello PA
Vet Ophthalmol; 2009; 12(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 19751486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
