These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1608105)

  • 1. How the doctor got gagged.
    Archer WR
    JAMA; 1992 Jul; 268(1):50; author reply 51. PubMed ID: 1608105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How the doctor got gagged. The disintegrating right of privacy in the physician-patient relationship.
    Sugarman J; Powers M
    JAMA; 1991 Dec; 266(23):3323-7. PubMed ID: 1960832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rust v. Sullivan: triumph of the right over reason.
    Call EC
    J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Winter; 31(1):123-42. PubMed ID: 11656449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The discourse ethics alternative to Rust v. Sullivan.
    Leedes GC
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1991; 26(1):87-143. PubMed ID: 11659547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice.
    Berg P
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Government funding in Title X projects: circumscribing the constitutional rights of the indigent: Rust v. Sullivan.
    Maher L
    Calif West Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):143-82. PubMed ID: 11656260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mum's the word: the Supreme Court and family planning.
    Mariner WK
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Feb; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 1739169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The right of privacy protects the doctor-patient relationship.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK
    JAMA; 1990 Feb; 263(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 2296149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rust v. Sullivan.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1991 May; 111():1759-89. PubMed ID: 12041295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health law.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 1992 Jul; 268(3):364-6. PubMed ID: 1535384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rust v Sullivan: legal issues and ethical concerns.
    Spielman B
    Womens Health Issues; 1991; 1(4):172-6. PubMed ID: 1822812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. South Dakota's abortion script--threatening the physician-patient relationship.
    Lazzarini Z
    N Engl J Med; 2008 Nov; 359(21):2189-91. PubMed ID: 19020321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The woman's right to know: a model approach to the informed consent of abortion.
    Renfer SO; Shaheen R; Hegarty M
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1991; 22(2):409-43. PubMed ID: 11651345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right of privacy protects the doctor-patient relationship.
    JAMA; 1990 Jul; 264(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 2393438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
    Silver SA
    Ohio State Law J; 1998; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Law, medicine, and the "gag rule".
    Ball JR
    Ann Intern Med; 1991 Sep; 115(5):403-4. PubMed ID: 1863032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma.
    Eller TR
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996; 71(4):639-70. PubMed ID: 11660407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Woman, womb, and bodily integrity.
    Neff CL
    Yale J Law Fem; 1991; 3(2):327-53. PubMed ID: 11656226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.