132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16082263)
1. Cochlear implant outcome is not influenced by the choice of ear.
Francis HW; Yeagle JD; Bowditch S; Niparko JK
Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4 Suppl):7S-16S. PubMed ID: 16082263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.
Francis HW; Yeagle JD; Brightwell T; Venick H
Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1747-52. PubMed ID: 15454765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term asymmetric hearing affects cochlear implantation outcomes differently in adults with pre- and postlingual hearing loss.
Boisvert I; McMahon CM; Dowell RC; Lyxell B
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129167. PubMed ID: 26043227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spoken word recognition development in children with residual hearing using cochlear implants and hearing AIDS in opposite ears.
Holt RF; Kirk KI; Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Campbell W
Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4 Suppl):82S-91S. PubMed ID: 16082270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monaural or binaural sound deprivation in postlingual hearing loss: Cochlear implant in the worse ear.
Canale A; Dalmasso G; Dagna F; Lacilla M; Montuschi C; Rosa RD; Albera R
Laryngoscope; 2016 Aug; 126(8):1905-10. PubMed ID: 26542290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors Predicting Postoperative Unilateral and Bilateral Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients with Acoustic Hearing.
Plant K; McDermott H; van Hoesel R; Dawson P; Cowan R
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 26462170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception.
Sheffield SW; Jahn K; Gifford RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 25690775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relative importance of monaural sound deprivation and bilateral significant hearing loss in predicting cochlear implantation outcomes.
Boisvert I; McMahon CM; Tremblay G; Lyxell B
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 21750463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss.
Franko-Tobin E; Camilon PR; Camposeo E; Holcomb MA; Meyer TA
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 25569365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):e33-43. PubMed ID: 24556970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits of Bimodal Hearing With Cochlear and Middle Ear Implants: Preliminary Results in Four Patients.
Lee HJ; Kim SH; Moon IS; Jung J; Lee JM; Choi JY
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jul; 39(6):e422-e428. PubMed ID: 29697586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of low frequency on speech performance with bimodal hearing in bilateral severe hearing loss.
Choi SJ; Lee JB; Bahng J; Lee WK; Park CH; Kim HJ; Lee JH
Laryngoscope; 2016 Dec; 126(12):2817-2822. PubMed ID: 27075047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation.
Mamelle E; Granger B; Sterkers O; Lahlou G; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 277(3):705-713. PubMed ID: 31802226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
