These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1608256)

  • 1. Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses.
    Bacon SP; Gleitman RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):642-53. PubMed ID: 1608256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bacon SP; Viemeister NF
    Audiology; 1985; 24(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 3994589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1067-73. PubMed ID: 11519575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal modulation transfer functions for band-limited noise in subjects with cochlear hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Shailer MJ; Schooneveldt GP
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Aug; 26(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 1446186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting the loudness of modulated sounds.
    Moore BC; Vickers DA; Baer T; Launer S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2757-72. PubMed ID: 10335628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise.
    Gustafsson HA; Arlinger SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):518-29. PubMed ID: 8120263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Oates PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):399-415. PubMed ID: 12411773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.
    Studebaker GA; Sherbecoe RL; McDaniel DM; Gwaltney CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Apr; 105(4):2431-44. PubMed ID: 10212424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity as a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise With Hearing Aids.
    Bernstein JG; Danielsson H; Hällgren M; Stenfelt S; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Trends Hear; 2016 Nov; 20():. PubMed ID: 27815546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comodulation masking release in subjects with unilateral and bilateral hearing impairment.
    Moore BC; Shailer MJ; Hall JW; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):435-51. PubMed ID: 8423260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of noise on word discrimination by subjects with impaired hearing, compared with those with normal hearing.
    Pekkarinen E; Salmivalli A; Suonpää J
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 2336538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly.
    Takahashi GA; Bacon SP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 35(6):1410-21. PubMed ID: 1494284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Second-order modulation detection thresholds for pure-tone and narrow-band noise carriers.
    Lorenzi C; Simpson MI; Millman RE; Griffiths TD; Woods WP; Rees A; Green GG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2470-8. PubMed ID: 11757936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of a temporal gap in low-frequency narrow-band signals by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    DeFilippo CL; Snell KB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Nov; 80(5):1354-8. PubMed ID: 3782613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dierking DM; Dorn PA; Hoover BM; Fitzpatrick DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):263-78. PubMed ID: 12880040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Smoski WJ; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1541-7. PubMed ID: 3711453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modulation masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lorenzi C; Micheyl C; Berthommier F; Portalier S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 40(1):200-7. PubMed ID: 9113870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of the temporal-modulation transfer function for a single listener with cochlear hearing loss and left-hemisphere damage.
    Hescot F; Lorenzi C; Debruille X; Camus JF
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 34(6):341-51. PubMed ID: 11201321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effects of Duration and Level on Spectral Modulation Perception.
    Isarangura S; Eddins AC; Ozmeral EJ; Eddins DA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3876-3886. PubMed ID: 31638883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.