These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1608256)

  • 21. Psychometric functions for the CID W-22 and NU Auditory Test No. 6. Materials spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; Oyler AL
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):430-3. PubMed ID: 9360866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detection and discrimination of amplitude-modulated signals by macaque monkeys.
    Moody DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3499-510. PubMed ID: 8046141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Telephone listening ability for hearing-impaired individuals.
    Holmes AE; Frank T
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 6724177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people.
    Peters RW; Moore BC; Baer T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):577-87. PubMed ID: 9440343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal modulation transfer functions measured from auditory-nerve responses following sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kale S; Heinz MG
    Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 286(1-2):64-75. PubMed ID: 22366500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spectral shape discrimination by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Lentz JJ; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1604-16. PubMed ID: 12656395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.
    Dimitrijevic A; John MS; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 14770019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Discrimination of amplitude-modulation depth by subjects with normal and impaired hearing.
    Schlittenlacher J; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Nov; 140(5):3487. PubMed ID: 27908066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability of threshold, slope, and PB max for monosyllabic words.
    Beattie RC; Raffin MJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 3990262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of low-pass noise in word-recognition testing.
    Cohen RL; Keith RW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Mar; 19(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 1271800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modulation detection interference in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Bacon SP; Opie JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Apr; 45(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 12003520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1706-17. PubMed ID: 12656402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of presentation levels to maximize word recognition scores.
    Guthrie LA; Mackersie CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Jun; 20(6):381-90. PubMed ID: 19594086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acoustical changes of loudly spoken speech and their effects on speech recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Tschopp K; Käser H; Kunert F
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Jun; 26(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 1393153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech.
    Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154920. PubMed ID: 27144601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 3950200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.